No. That would be the same as having a perpetual motion machine which is impossible.
No, nuclear generators are not 100 percent efficient. They typically have an efficiency rate of around 30-40%, which means that 30-40% of the energy from the nuclear reactions is converted into electricity, while the rest is lost as heat.
If a machine was 100 percent efficient, the AMA would be equal to the IMA. This is because in an ideal scenario where the machine loses no energy to friction or other factors, the AMA (actual mechanical advantage) would be the same as the IMA (ideal mechanical advantage).
Yes, that's correct. When the work input to a machine equals the output work, the machine is considered 100 percent efficient. This means that all the energy put into the machine is transformed into useful work without any energy being wasted or lost.
No machine can be 100% efficient due to factors such as friction, heat loss, and external factors that affect performance. These limitations result in energy being lost or wasted during the operation of the machine, reducing its overall efficiency.
Machines are never 100% efficient due to factors such as friction, heat loss, and mechanical limitations. Some amount of energy will always be lost during the transfer or transformation process, making it impossible for a machine to achieve perfect efficiency.
No, nuclear generators are not 100 percent efficient. They typically have an efficiency rate of around 30-40%, which means that 30-40% of the energy from the nuclear reactions is converted into electricity, while the rest is lost as heat.
If a machine was 100 percent efficient, the AMA would be equal to the IMA. This is because in an ideal scenario where the machine loses no energy to friction or other factors, the AMA (actual mechanical advantage) would be the same as the IMA (ideal mechanical advantage).
Yes, that's correct. When the work input to a machine equals the output work, the machine is considered 100 percent efficient. This means that all the energy put into the machine is transformed into useful work without any energy being wasted or lost.
No machine can be 100% efficient due to factors such as friction, heat loss, and external factors that affect performance. These limitations result in energy being lost or wasted during the operation of the machine, reducing its overall efficiency.
Machines are never 100% efficient due to factors such as friction, heat loss, and mechanical limitations. Some amount of energy will always be lost during the transfer or transformation process, making it impossible for a machine to achieve perfect efficiency.
Theoretical mechanical advantage is the ratio of the input force to the output force without considering friction, while actual mechanical advantage includes frictional losses in the machine. If a machine is 100 percent efficient, there will be no frictional losses, so the theoretical and actual mechanical advantages will be the same, resulting in a 1:1 ratio of input force to output force.
Basically, almost NO physical process is 100% efficient.
Friction between moving parts, energy losses due to heat, and limitations in material strength are factors that prevent a machine from being 100% efficient. These inefficiencies result in some of the input energy being wasted rather than being fully converted into useful work.
100% efficiency would mean that the machine is able to transform energy from one form into another without any loss of energy from the system in the process. For it to have greater than 100% efficiency, it would have to somehow generate additional energy, not contained in the system, in the process, and this is not possible.
because they are not proper
at 0'kelvin
Then the output work is less than the input work. That description applies to every machine that has ever been built or will ever be built.