Yes, according to current scientific understanding, every black hole is believed to contain a singularity at its core.
No, not every galaxy contains a black hole. While many galaxies do have a supermassive black hole at their center, there are also galaxies that do not have a black hole.
Not every galaxy has a black hole at its center. While many galaxies do have supermassive black holes at their centers, there are also galaxies that do not have black holes.
Not every galaxy has a black hole at its center, but many galaxies, including our own Milky Way, do have supermassive black holes at their centers.
At the center of every galaxy is a supermassive black hole.
At the center of every galaxy is a supermassive black hole.
Well, a singularity is part of a black hole. Although no-one really knows what existed before, a likely explanation is that every black hole contains another universe. So when our black hole was created, we were too.
A black hole doesn't literally suck. A black hole pulls things closer to it. And it does this the same way that we stay on the earth--- gravity. A singularity, a point with mass but no height, width or length is at the center of every black hole. This singularity is what has the gravitational strength to pull everything, even light, towards it. It does it all with an unfathomably strong gravitational pull.
No, not every galaxy contains a black hole. While many galaxies do have a supermassive black hole at their center, there are also galaxies that do not have a black hole.
It is first stretched then pressurised. so if a human was to enter a black hole, you would first be turned into a spaghetti-looking thing then you will be pressureised. too much pressure on any human will make them explode.
As best we can determine, every galaxy has one in its center.
The centre of a black hole is singularity.A singularity is NOT a (specific) place. It is a property of a function where the value of that function approaches infinity. For example, the function f: x ⟼ 1/x has a singularity at x = 0 because lim_{x → 0⁺} f(x) = +∞.A singularity is the set of points where a metric is undefined. It is a geometric property of a manifold that is not limited to black holes, and is not necessarily a single point.A singularity can be just a coordinate singularity that disappears if you choose a different coordinate system for the manifold. For example, the Schwarzschild metric that describes non-rotating electrically neutral black holes has a coordinate singularity at the event horizon in Schwarzschild coordinates, but not in Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates.By contrast, every known black hole metric has a true (curvature) singularity with all coordinate systems in or near the center of a black hole.That singularity does not need to be a point either. For example, in the Kerr and Kerr–Newman metrics that describe rotating black holes (with angular momentum J ≠ 0) the singularity is a ring (a set of adjacent points/events).Also, it is important to understand that singularities with black holes are not (a set of) points in space, but in space*time*: they are a set of *events*.A spacetime singularity does not have to be a spacetime *curvature* singularity. For example, the Schwarzschild metric, the spacetime metric of a spherical mass distribution with total mass M, zero angular momentum, and zero electric charge, has a singularity at the Schwarzschild radius r = rₛ := 2 G M/c²:ds² = ±(1 − rₛ/r) c²dt² ∓ 1/(1 − rₛ/r) dr² ∓ r² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²).Because r = rₛ ⇒ 1/(1 − rₛ/r) = 1/0 ⇒ lim_{r → rₛ} ds² = ∓∞.However, this is NOT a spacetime *curvature* singularity because it can be avoided by using a different coordinate system. For example, the metric is in Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates:ds² = 32G³M³/r exp(−r/(2 G M)) (±dT² ∓ dX²) ∓ r² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²),where c = 1. Now,r = rₛ = 2 G M/c² ⇒ ds² = 16G²M² exp(−1) (±dT² ∓ dX²) ∓ 4G²M² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²) ≠ ±∞,and the spacetime singularity at r = rₛ disappears.There is still a spacetime *curvature* singularity at r = 0 because 32G³M³/0 is not defined in these coordinates, and there are no known coordinates that can avoid that.Finally, even a spacetime *curvature* singularity does NOT have to be point-like. The curvature singularity of the Kerr and Kerr–Newman metrics, for a black hole with non-zero angular momentum, is *ring*-shaped.
A singularity is NOT a (specific) place. It is a property of a function where the value of that function approaches infinity. For example, the function f: x ⟼ 1/x has a singularity at x = 0 because lim_{x → 0⁺} f(x) = +∞.A singularity is the set of points where a metric is undefined. It is a geometric property of a manifold that is not limited to black holes, and is not necessarily a single point.A singularity can be just a coordinate singularity that disappears if you choose a different coordinate system for the manifold. For example, the Schwarzschild metric that describes non-rotating electrically neutral black holes has a coordinate singularity at the event horizon in Schwarzschild coordinates, but not in Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates.By contrast, every known black hole metric has a true (curvature) singularity with all coordinate systems in or near the center of a black hole.That singularity does not need to be a point either. For example, in the Kerr and Kerr–Newman metrics that describe rotating black holes (with angular momentum J ≠ 0) the singularity is a ring (a set of adjacent points/events).Also, it is important to understand that singularities with black holes are not (a set of) points in space, but in space*time*: they are a set of *events*.A spacetime singularity does not have to be a spacetime *curvature* singularity. For example, the Schwarzschild metric, the spacetime metric of a spherical mass distribution with total mass M, zero angular momentum, and zero electric charge, has a singularity at the Schwarzschild radius r = rₛ := 2 G M/c²:ds² = ±(1 − rₛ/r) c²dt² ∓ 1/(1 − rₛ/r) dr² ∓ r² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²).Because r = rₛ ⇒ 1/(1 − rₛ/r) = 1/0 ⇒ lim_{r → rₛ} ds² = ∓∞.However, this is NOT a spacetime *curvature* singularity because it can be avoided by using a different coordinate system. For example, the metric is in Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates:ds² = 32G³M³/r exp(−r/(2 G M)) (±dT² ∓ dX²) ∓ r² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²),where c = 1. Now,r = rₛ = 2 G M/c² ⇒ ds² = 16G²M² exp(−1) (±dT² ∓ dX²) ∓ 4G²M² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²) ≠ ±∞,and the spacetime singularity at r = rₛ disappears.There is still a spacetime *curvature* singularity at r = 0 because 32G³M³/0 is not defined in these coordinates, and there are no known coordinates that can avoid that.Finally, even a spacetime *curvature* singularity does NOT have to be point-like. The curvature singularity of the Kerr and Kerr–Newman metrics, for a black hole with non-zero angular momentum, is *ring*-shaped.
No, it contains mostly 5th generation Pokemon with a few from the fourth generation.
A hurricane can contain a massive amount of energy, equivalent to hundreds of atomic bombs exploding every second.
Every atom categorised within the same periodic element should contain the same atomic number, which represents the number of protons within the nucleus. Each element is unique in how many protons reside in one atom, for example all oxygen atoms would contain eight protons and hydrogen atoms would only contain one proton.
The event horizon of a black hole is a spherical area round the center of the black hole; it has a radius proportional to the mass of the black hole - a radius of about 2.95 kilometers for every solar mass.
Any every day item contain mendelevium.