A scientific theory can never be "proven". It can only be "Disproved.
Science is a process of elimination. We eliminate those theories which are not in agreement with current experimental evidence. But, it is nearly unreasonable to claim to have produced a theory which is in perfect agreement with every scientific discovery (at least for now).
Even the most accurate scientific theories in the 21st century have uncertainties, most notably General Relativity and Quantum mechanics. These theories, for example, aim to describe the same phenomena (or equivalent mechanical phenomena) in two separate regimes. While many people hold high levels of confidence in both theories, the two have been found to be irreconcilable.
It has, in fact, been proposed that the only way this problem can be overcome is if one (or both) of these theories is modified or abandoned. But, this is only possible if one (or both) of these theories is "disproved" .
This is not necessarily a foreign thought. A lot of evidence, both experimental and observational, already seem to disagree with these theories.
Unfortunately, abandoning one theory means having to develop a new and better theory. This has proven to be a huge task, and many scientists are preferring to either reform or modify the current theories.
No, a scientific theory cannot be proven. Instead, it is supported by evidence and can be further validated through experimentation and observation.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
A theory that has been confirmed through rigorous testing and observation is typically referred to as a scientific law.
A scientific theory is a theory that explains the scientist's observations, whereas a scientific law is a repeated pattern in the world that we have not sought an explanation for.Also, a scientific theory is proven correct in this time, but may not be correct during future times.
Yes, a theory can be proven wrong through empirical evidence that contradicts its predictions or explanations. This process is fundamental to the scientific method, where theories are constantly tested and revised based on new data and observations.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
No, a scientific theory cannot be proven. Instead, it is supported by evidence and can be further validated through experimentation and observation.
A scientific theory is accepted as factual even though it hasn't been proven. A scientific law has been proven as fact.
It can change if it is proven wrong, or if a new theory is proven more likely to be true.
A scientific theory
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
yes
Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Scientific theory can usually be proven by a repeatable experiment. Popular theory is just what the masses and media think.
A scientific law is something that has been proved again and again under experimentation, and is always true. A scientific theory is an educated guess made based off of a group of data that is not proven to be true. For example, Newton's Laws are scientific laws since they have been proven to be always true. The theory of gravity is a scientific theory because gravity itself has not been completely proven to exist.
In general, a scientific theory is a proposed explanation that has not been fully proven yet, while a law is a theory that has been proven to be true by lots of experimentation. The theory of Gravity has been tested and shown to be correct so much that it is at this point clearly a scientific law.