Scientific theories are made to explain phenomena. Newton made his laws of motion to explain what he observed in the behavior of accelerating objects. When his law failed to explain the motion of very massive objects in situations of very large forces and speeds (such as the orbit of Mercury about the sun) the theory had to be modified slightly to explain the discrepancies. In this case this was done by Einstein's correction due to special relativity.
The correction for the orbit of Mecury amounts to a movement of 0.5 seconds of arc per year in the nodes of the orbit.
The theory of continental drift has changed over time. Initially proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century, it was met with skepticism. However, over the years with advancements in technology and research, the theory evolved into plate tectonics, which is widely accepted today.
Yes, scientific theories can change or be revised as new evidence is discovered and our understanding of the natural world evolves. This process is fundamental to the scientific method and helps to ensure that our theories align with the most up-to-date knowledge available.
The theory of relativity is actually a conglomerate of two theories which Einstein theorized at different times. Special relativity was published in 1905 and changed the scientific world until some of the ideas could not hold up to scrutiny. It was then that Einstein published the theory of general relativity in 1916.
If I understand the question correctly, you are asking whether a scientify *theory* can be revised as new evidence is presented, and the answer is YES. This forms the entire foundation of science - any theory that cannot be revised is contrary to the scientific method; it has, in effect, become dogma. Any theory that cannot be demonstrated through the available evidence must be rejected. So, if a scientist discovers new data that invalidates a previously working theory, then that theory is rejected by the scientific community.
Personal beliefs or opinions are not a result of scientific theory. Scientific theories are based on empirical evidence and reasoning, not on subjective views or perspectives.
dick and jane
Proof of it being wrong or another improved and better theory.
the theory that all planets and sun revolve around earth
Some one proves it wrong.
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
Whenever new data shows that its wrong.
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
Scientific theories can be changed or replaced when there has been significant evidence for the change. The scientific method must be used to create a new hypothesis, which must then be proven.
yes they can be changed!Scientific models change to reflect ongoing research to explain discrepancies in current theory versus actual experimental results.
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
Yes, a scientific theory can be rejected if new evidence or observations contradict its predictions or if a more accurate theory is developed. The rejection of a theory is an essential part of the scientific process that helps refine our understanding of the natural world.
The scientific theory should be changed.