There was something quite tragic about theClick Frenzyfrenzy, wasn’t there? The same could be said about the Black Friday stampedes in the US, the likes of which are bound to be repeated here in Australia on Boxing Day. It’s tasteless consumerism to the max, turning ordinary people into ravenous and mindless shoppers, with flow-on effects in the workplace.
But first, let’s go back to 1929. In an article written forNation’s Businessmagazine, Charles Kettering – a director of General Motors Research – opined on the need for companies to keep consumers dissatisfied. The moment people are happy with what they have, “almost immediately hard times would be upon us”, he wrote.
And so it is that marketers persevere with advertising to convince us we’re not sexy enough, popular enough, smart enough, or (whatever) enough, unless we purchase what they’re selling. Perhaps that’s why American comedian Bill Hicksreferredto marketers and advertisers as “Satan’s spawn filling the world with bile and garbage”.
This is where work comes in. In order to fund the lifestyles to which we’ve become accustomed, we work. In many cases, we overwork. Then, as our credit card balances swell and our home loans balloon, we work even harder just to keep up. Where households could once get by with just one wage earner, today both parents have little choice but to be employed.
AdvertisementOne analysis at the University of Melbourne sought to discover the reasons why people are increasingly compelled to work more than 50 hours a week. The researchers looked at a variety of possible explanations. Was it that people were motivated by the desire to be ‘ideal workers’? Was it a fear of losing their job? Or was it due to the collapse in union membership?
What came out in front was none of the above. The correct answer was consumerism. It was the “work-and-spend” trap, an endless cycle characterised by the desire for higher living standards, linked with greater levels of debt that can only be managed by working longer and harder.
In an article published in thePacific Ecologistjournal, Professor Sharon Beder from the University of Wollongong chronicled the history of consumerism’s impact on the workforce. It has made, she writes, workers “less likely to question the conditions of their work, the way it dominates their life, and the lack of power that they have as workers”.
That’s because consumerism grants people a taste of the good life – televisions, cars, electrical goods, houses, luxury items, holidays – and they want more of it. But that stuff can only be financed by working more … at any sacrifice.
Technology was supposed to make a positive difference. It was meant to remove the need to work so much, since machines were expected to take over. Instead, the opposite occurred, with technologies chaining many of us to our jobs beyond the standard working week in a drive towards ever-greater productivity.
So what would happen if we were all to collectively reduce our consumption? Undoubtedly, the economy would tank. Jobs would be lost. Politicians would be voted out of office. There’d be a recession; maybe even a depression. This all-consuming consumerism seems to be an inescapable part of life.
It doesn’t help that the success of our nation, and every nation these days, is determined by the strength of the economy – and a preoccupation with perpetual growth – a measure that can only be sustained by a relentless insatiability for products and services.
That’s why it was so refreshing to read what Gina Rinehart had to say yesterday. The world’s richest woman advised us allto live within our meansand to be wary of too much debt. Can’t really argue with that.
Advantage: Consumerism can drive economic growth and innovation by stimulating demand for goods and services, creating jobs and supporting businesses. It also provides individuals with access to a wide range of products and choices. Disadvantage: Consumerism can lead to overconsumption, environmental degradation, and excessive materialism. It can also contribute to social inequalities and financial instability if people accumulate debt to sustain their consumption levels.
Fraudulism was an art movement that aimed to highlight issues of consumerism and mass production by creating works that imitated famous artworks or styles. Artists would create pieces that looked like authentic pieces in order to comment on the commercialization of art and the blurring lines between originality and imitation. This movement sought to challenge the idea of authenticity in art and provoke questions about the value and meaning of originality in a consumer-driven society.
Mimmo Rotella was an Italian artist known for his innovative method of "decollage," which involved tearing and removing layers of posters from walls to create new artworks. His work often explored themes of consumerism, advertising, and mass media, reflecting on the impact of these elements on society and culture. Rotella's creations blur the lines between art and everyday life, challenging viewers to reconsider the boundaries of traditional artistic practices.
The types of mechanical work include static work, dynamic work, and intensive work. Static work refers to work done without motion, dynamic work involves movement, and intensive work focuses on the internal energy changes within a system.
Input work is the work done on a machine, while output work is the work done by the machine. Efficiency of a simple machine is calculated as the ratio of output work to input work. The efficiency of a simple machine is high when the output work is close to the input work, indicating that the machine is converting most of the input work into useful output work.
significance of consumerism
consumerism
how did consumerism change during the eisenhower administration
Consumerism can be categorized into several types, including materialistic consumerism, which focuses on acquiring physical goods and possessions; experiential consumerism, which prioritizes experiences over material items; and ethical consumerism, where purchasing decisions are influenced by social and environmental considerations. Additionally, conspicuous consumerism emphasizes status and social standing through luxury goods. Each type reflects different motivations and values associated with consumption patterns in society.
Consumerism is a movement seeking to protect consumers against improperly labeled or shoddy merchandise. There is no synonym.
Consumerism can be defined as a social movement seeking to augment the right of buyers in relation to seller
well back in the raoring twenties .....advertisements such as bilboardds news ppr articles and etc....that augmented certain items to be soooo amazing when really they didnt work at all this started consumerism..... http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/photos/HTML/1000.HTML
Consumerism can be categorized into several types, including materialistic consumerism, which focuses on acquiring goods for personal satisfaction; ethical consumerism, where individuals make purchasing decisions based on social, environmental, or ethical considerations; and conspicuous consumerism, characterized by buying luxury items to display wealth and status. Additionally, sustainable consumerism emphasizes responsible consumption that minimizes environmental impact and promotes social equity. Each type reflects different motivations and values influencing consumer behavior.
OSHA is not concerned with the consumer- it regulates safety of workers and workplaces. It has no authority over any relation between a seller and a consumer.
hh i like this ....
With grees Oo
Carnivores