It doesn't cause you can still get artillery and such
*Um somehow I don't think they mean in a battle field :P I would assume that you are talking about physics? In which case the answer would be that the concept of a field eliminates the idea of action at a distance because the objects are thought to be in constant contact with the field.
there is no contact between th objects,and the forces are acting at a distance putting this in terms of the field concept, we can say that the orbiting satellite and electron interact with the force fields of the object.
An action at a distance is a term used to describe how masses attract when they are held at a certain distance. If one of these objects is charged is creates an electric field that can be felt by all other masses within a certain distance.
Spooky action at a distance refers to the phenomenon in quantum mechanics where particles can instantaneously influence each other's states, regardless of the distance separating them. This challenges our understanding of quantum mechanics because it suggests that information can travel faster than the speed of light, which goes against the principles of causality and locality in traditional physics. This concept was famously described by Albert Einstein as "spooky action at a distance" and remains a topic of debate and research in the field of quantum physics.
The concept of distance over time, known as speed or velocity, measures how far an object travels in a certain amount of time. In physics, this concept is used to calculate motion, acceleration, and other important factors in understanding the behavior of objects in the physical world.
Michael Faraday introduced the idea of electric field to explain action-at-a-distance forces between charged objects. He used this concept to describe how charges create a force that acts on other charges in space, providing a more intuitive understanding of electrical interactions. This laid the foundation for the modern understanding of electromagnetism.
It doesn't cause you can still get artillery and such *Um somehow I don't think they mean in a battle field :P I would assume that you are talking about physics? In which case the answer would be that the concept of a field eliminates the idea of action at a distance because the objects are thought to be in constant contact with the field.
there is no contact between th objects,and the forces are acting at a distance putting this in terms of the field concept, we can say that the orbiting satellite and electron interact with the force fields of the object.
An action at a distance is a term used to describe how masses attract when they are held at a certain distance. If one of these objects is charged is creates an electric field that can be felt by all other masses within a certain distance.
Spooky action at a distance refers to the phenomenon in quantum mechanics where particles can instantaneously influence each other's states, regardless of the distance separating them. This challenges our understanding of quantum mechanics because it suggests that information can travel faster than the speed of light, which goes against the principles of causality and locality in traditional physics. This concept was famously described by Albert Einstein as "spooky action at a distance" and remains a topic of debate and research in the field of quantum physics.
The concept of distance over time, known as speed or velocity, measures how far an object travels in a certain amount of time. In physics, this concept is used to calculate motion, acceleration, and other important factors in understanding the behavior of objects in the physical world.
Michael Faraday introduced the idea of electric field to explain action-at-a-distance forces between charged objects. He used this concept to describe how charges create a force that acts on other charges in space, providing a more intuitive understanding of electrical interactions. This laid the foundation for the modern understanding of electromagnetism.
An electric field is created by a charged object. The field extends outward from the object in all directions and its strength decreases with distance. The electric field is a fundamental concept in physics that helps explain the interactions between charged particles.
The relationship between magnetic field strength and distance in a magnetic field is inversely proportional. This means that as the distance from the source of the magnetic field increases, the strength of the magnetic field decreases.
Assuming that both have mass, then in order to completely eliminate the gravitational forces between them, an infinite distance between their centers is required.
I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.
According to the concept of mastering physics, the electric field inside a conductor is zero.
The electric field strength decreases with increasing distance from the source of the field. This relationship follows an inverse square law, meaning that the field strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source. In other words, as the distance from the source doubles, the electric field strength decreases by a factor of four.