The world would likely be affected in several ways. Military strategies and warfare tactics would have evolved differently without the use of gunpowder. Transportation and communication could have developed differently since gunpowder played a role in the advancement of technology like cannons and rockets. Additionally, the balance of power between nations and empires may have shifted due to the absence of firearms.
It depends on what you are trying to do. If you are trying to find north, a magnetic compass is more important. If you are trying to make fireworks or to fire a gun that requires gunpowder, gunpowder is more important. If you mean in a historical sense, that is also a matter of opinion. Without compasses, sailors would not be able to navigate. Without gunpowder, they would not be able to kill the people they found in the lands they sailed to. The world would be a different place without both. In short, it is a matter of opinion which one is more important.
The world would likely be different without Albert Einstein's contributions to physics, specifically his theory of relativity. Scientific progress may have followed a different path, delaying advancements in areas like atomic energy and cosmology. However, it is important to remember that scientific progress is a collaborative effort, and others would likely have eventually made similar discoveries.
Yes, the explosion would likely be noticeable and could potentially be dangerous. Gunpowder is highly combustible and can create a significant explosion when ignited. It is not safe to ingest or ignite gunpowder in any form.
Without friction, it would be difficult to walk, drive, or hold objects in place. Machines would not work efficiently and sports would be very different. Overall, life would be more challenging and less predictable without friction.
If light did not reflect or refract, objects would appear dark and invisible, as there would be no way for light to bounce off their surfaces or change direction when passing through different mediums. This would make it nearly impossible to see, resulting in a world without vision and a complete lack of visual perception.
how would the world be different with out pocahontas
It depends on what you are trying to do. If you are trying to find north, a magnetic compass is more important. If you are trying to make fireworks or to fire a gun that requires gunpowder, gunpowder is more important. If you mean in a historical sense, that is also a matter of opinion. Without compasses, sailors would not be able to navigate. Without gunpowder, they would not be able to kill the people they found in the lands they sailed to. The world would be a different place without both. In short, it is a matter of opinion which one is more important.
there would not be a food chain
There wouldn't be train tracks, and you couldn't play tic-tac-toe.
we would not have lef blowers and lawnmotors in the world and the world would be so mess
No, sulfur is a crucial component in gunpowder. Gunpowder is typically composed of sulfur, charcoal, and potassium nitrate (saltpeter). Removing sulfur from the mixture would change the composition and likely impact the effectiveness of the gunpowder.
Einsteinium is not so important to change the world.
we would not have women's rights
we would have to use alternative resources to get things done.
???edit if u know.k?
Honestly, probably not much different.
The world would have been different because there would have never been African American or black people play in baseball history