It is impossible to accurately estimate the total weight of all the food consumed in a person's lifetime. This would depend on various factors including individual diet, serving sizes, and eating habits.
The highest quantity of life could be found in ecosystems like tropical rainforests, where biodiversity is incredibly rich and varied. These habitats support a wide range of plant and animal species, many of which are interdependent and form complex food webs.
No, Lou Gramm was never 400 pounds, he was about 235 pounds at the most.
I'm not sure if you mean sunlight, or just a general question about light.if you mean sunlight.. then, I would say no sunlight would have a clearly negative effect on life on earth. No sunlight = no plants = no plant eating animals = no food for humans = everyone dies.If it's just a general question of light, (as if you were in a closet with no light), then the only negative impact would be you couldn't see light reflected off objects.
68 pounds even though its awesome man go to homeland.com to have more answers or get your living butt back to walmart.com and get a life remember its 68 pounds.
An empty universe would have significant implications for the existence of life and the concept of reality. Without any matter or energy, life as we know it would not be able to exist. The absence of any physical entities would challenge our understanding of reality, as our perception of the world is based on interactions with physical objects. This could lead to a reevaluation of our understanding of existence and the nature of reality itself.
IMPOSSIBLE.
Very hard because they had to kill their food,and sometimes their food would kill them.
The medival life was a life where it depned on what your job was. For exmaple if you were a lord your life would be great. You would be rich,comfortable, and have lots of food. But if you were a peasant your life was tough. You were poor,uncofebmable, and you could never be rich. If you were a peasant your kids would be peasants and your grandkids would be peasants.
Animal life has evolved to exploit all environments where food can be found to support it. As the sea has abundant plant and algal life, it is only natural that creatures would develop which could use this food.
No. If a human was going to live a healthy life on just one food that food would have to be breast milk (from another human).
Life without food would be impossible as food provides the necessary nutrients and energy for our bodies to function. Without food, our bodies would quickly deteriorate and we would not be able to survive for long.
LIFE!
you could say that the giraffe gets more opportunitys to get food. they could get it on the higher branchs of trees and lower ones if they are taller.
Make jerky out of it. Or freeze it. Canned food has a long shelf life. Also you could go hunting to get fresh food
all life would end
You could, it would be expensive and the animals you move would not survive. Antarctica is too cold to support life, and there is no food chain there.
one resolution could be to lose 50 pounds... or more.