loads of space
Yes, the down quark is slightly heavier than the up quark. However, the difference in mass between a neutron and a proton is not solely due to the difference between the down and up quarks. Other factors, such as binding energy and contributions from virtual particles, also play a role in the mass difference between the two particles.
To make a proton, which has a charge of +1, you would need two up quarks (each with a charge of +2/3) and one down quark (with a charge of -1/3) since the total charge of a proton is the sum of the charges of its constituent quarks.
A neutron has 3 valence quarks. An up quark, and two down quarks. An up quark has a charge of 2/3 and a down quark has a charge of -1/3.Since 2/3 - 1/3 - 1/3 = 0, neutrons have a neutral charge.Besides valence quarks, supposedly a hadron can contain an infinite sea of quarks that don't affect the properties of the hadron.
The quark model was independently proposed by physicists Murray Gell-Man and George Zweig in 1964. Gell-Mann originally named the quark after the sound made by ducks. For some time, he was undecided on an actual spelling for the term he intended to coin, until he found the word quark in James Joyce's book, Finnegan's WakeThree quarks for Muster Mark!Sure he has not got much of a barkAnd sure any he has it's all beside the mark.-James Joyce, Finnegans WakeGell-Mann went into further detail regarding the name of the quark in his book The Quark and the Jaguar:In 1963, when I assigned the name "quark" to the fundamental constituents of the nucleon, I had the sound first, without the spelling, which could have been "kwork". Then, in one of my occasional perusals of Finnegans Wake, by James Joyce, I came across the word "quark" in the phrase "Three quarks for Muster Mark". Since "quark" (meaning, for one thing, the cry of the gull) was clearly intended to rhyme with "Mark", as well as "bark" and other such words, I had to find an excuse to pronounce it as "kwork". But the book represents the dream of a publican named Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker. Words in the text are typically drawn from several sources at once, like the "portmanteau" words in "Through the Looking-Glass". From time to time, phrases occur in the book that are partially determined by calls for drinks at the bar. I argued, therefore, that perhaps one of the multiple sources of the cry "Three quarks for Muster Mark" might be "Three quarts for Mister Mark", in which case the pronunciation "kwork" would not be totally unjustified. In any case, the number three fitted perfectly the way quarks occur in nature.- From Wikipedia.com
No, you do not float in space. In space, there is no gravity to pull you down, so you would float freely.
There is no limit to the number line. Since it is infinitely long, it is a fact that for each number in existence there is a number greater than it. So a number greater than "gogolplex", for example, would a gogolplex and one or two gogolplex. I'm not aware, however, of any number that is larger than a gogolplex that has been officially named if that's the question you're asking.
If a meson were made up of a quark and an antiquark with different colors but the antiquark's color was not the anticolor of the quark, then the meson would not be color-neutral overall. This configuration would violate the requirement for color neutrality in hadrons as defined by quantum chromodynamics.
Yes, the down quark is slightly heavier than the up quark. However, the difference in mass between a neutron and a proton is not solely due to the difference between the down and up quarks. Other factors, such as binding energy and contributions from virtual particles, also play a role in the mass difference between the two particles.
quark is made from buttermilk. cottage cheese is made from milk. .
There are 3 parts to an atom: 1. Protons 2. Neutrons 3. Electrons The electrons are the smallest of the 3 and therefor weigh the least. A proton is composed of 2 up quarks and 1 down quark while a neutron is composed of 1 up quark and 2 down quarks. The Up Quark weighs more than the Down quark. Therefore, the proton would weigh more. See Photon exhange to see how an Up quark turns in a Down quark through photon exchange.
A compact and wall-mounted bookshelf would be best suited for a desk in a small office space, as it saves floor space and provides storage for books and other items without taking up too much room.
Very small matter with enormous mass would be classified as a gravitational singularity. An infinitely small point in space with a finite mass. These exist in black holes. However no, nothing can damage space-time as far as anyone knows. The closest you get to "tearing" space-time would be a singularity. Its density influences the curvature of space-time (Gravity) more than anything else. Dragging down space-time into an infinite point.
If someone wanted to make a small observatory, they would need an extreme amount of space. Someone who wanted to build an observatory, either on top of a hill or on flat land, would need thousands of square feet and a big open area.
the job of a forward is to shot that would be the small forward and the power forward would be to shot inside or to create space
u would die in a small bright space while being vaporized into nothing
People would say yes. But actually, no. Neutrino is nearly 20 times smaller.
Padding is the inner space between the border and content of an HTML tag.The code below would have a small space between the border and content of the :Content hereThis code would have a large space between the border and content:Content here