Both. We explain gravity as a theory but gravity is considered a law.
A theory and a law serve different purposes in science. A theory explains why something happens based on evidence and research, while a law describes a phenomenon or pattern observed in nature without necessarily explaining why it occurs. Therefore, a theory cannot "become" a law because they are fundamentally different in terms of their function and scope.
A scientific law is the description of a recurring event that occurs in nature. A scientific theory is an explanation of the law. The law does not change, but the theory may change when new data indicate that it needs to.
A theory that has been confirmed through rigorous testing and observation is typically referred to as a scientific law.
A scientific theory is an explanation supported by evidence and can be modified as new evidence is discovered. A scientific law is a description of a natural phenomenon that is consistent and often expressed mathematically, without explaining why it happens.
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
relate the force of gavity on the different object to their masses relate the force of gavity on the different object to their masses relate the force of gavity on the different object to their masses
gavity
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
Isaac Newton discovered the concept of gravity by accident when observing an apple fall from a tree, which led him to develop the law of universal gravitation.
Because they're heavier
Gavity
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.
A law is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon, whereas a theory attempts to explain a law.
It was a law not the theory because this principle has also proved by him.
Isaac Newton.
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.