Yes, nuclear power is far safer than coal.
Nuclear power plants do not pollute the environment because of strict regulations governing their waste. The only danger from nuclear power plants are due to accidents like meltdowns or explosions. There have been a number of nuclear power plant incidents, but altogether, not including Chernobyl, these have only killed around 13 people. Only the Chernobyl incident resulted in widespread loss of life, estimated at around 6,000 people.
For comparison, coal power plant pollution kills as many people as Chernobyl every few weeks.
The amount of radioactive waste produced by nuclear power plants is about 3 metric tons per terawatt-hour, while the amount of radioactive waste produced by burning coal is about 2 metric tons per terawatt-hour. However, the nuclear waste is contained and tightly regulated. The coal radioactive waste is dumped into the atmosphere as ash or stored in ponds with much less regulation.
Because the coal power plant radioactive waste is dumped into the environment, and the nuclear power plant waste is stored safely, coal power plants actually irradiate you 100 times as much as nuclear power plants:
False. Nuclear power is used to generate about 25% of the electricity in the United States, and about 75% of the electricity in France. Nuclear power is far safer than coal-fired power plants, and produces no harmful emissions, if you care about such things.
Nuclear power is power (generally electrical) produced from controlled (i.e., non-explosive) nuclear reactions. Commercial plants in use to date use nuclear fission reactions. Electric utility reactors heat water to produce steam, which is then used to generate electricity. In 2007, 14% of the world's electricity came from nuclear power, despite concerns about safety and radioactive waste management. More than 150 naval vessels using nuclear propulsion have been built.Nuclear fusion reactions are widely believed to be safer than fission and appear potentially viable, though technically quite difficult. Fusion power has been under intense theoretical and experimental investigation for many years.Both fission and fusion appear promising for some space propulsion applications in the mid- to distant-future, using low thrust for long durations to achieve high mission velocities. Radioactive decay has been used on a relatively small (few kW) scale, mostly to power space missions and experiments.
Firstly import costs and the costs of uranium are far more stable and lower than the cost of oil and gas imports into a country. This was the main reason that France started its nuclear power regime during the last oil crisis. Also plants only need a small amount of uranium to produce a lot of electricity. It is also said to be a "greener energy" as in the fact that its CO2 emissions are lower than that of oil and gas. They are generally safer as they do not break down as much and there are statisitics available that prove that people are more likely to die from a car accident than a nuclear meltdown.
Wind energy is used to power things that need electric power (which can be made by wind energy). Its safer for the economy and it is unlimited and never runs out instead of stinking up the air and shortening lives of people due to asthma attacks and greenhouse gas emissions.
Biomass produces no radioactive waste.
False. Nuclear power is used to generate about 25% of the electricity in the United States, and about 75% of the electricity in France. Nuclear power is far safer than coal-fired power plants, and produces no harmful emissions, if you care about such things.
Nuclear power is power (generally electrical) produced from controlled (i.e., non-explosive) nuclear reactions. Commercial plants in use to date use nuclear fission reactions. Electric utility reactors heat water to produce steam, which is then used to generate electricity. In 2007, 14% of the world's electricity came from nuclear power, despite concerns about safety and radioactive waste management. More than 150 naval vessels using nuclear propulsion have been built.Nuclear fusion reactions are widely believed to be safer than fission and appear potentially viable, though technically quite difficult. Fusion power has been under intense theoretical and experimental investigation for many years.Both fission and fusion appear promising for some space propulsion applications in the mid- to distant-future, using low thrust for long durations to achieve high mission velocities. Radioactive decay has been used on a relatively small (few kW) scale, mostly to power space missions and experiments.
We do have nuclear energy now, about 20 percent of total electricity in the US. It can only be used to generate electricity, so it does not cause any change in the way we use energy resources, other than using somewhat less fossil fuels.
a little safer, perhaps a little less bright
Geothermal energy is considered safer than nuclear energy because it does not produce radioactive waste or carry the risk of a catastrophic accident such as a nuclear meltdown. Geothermal power plants also have a smaller footprint and lower environmental impact compared to nuclear plants.
Firstly import costs and the costs of uranium are far more stable and lower than the cost of oil and gas imports into a country. This was the main reason that France started its nuclear power regime during the last oil crisis. Also plants only need a small amount of uranium to produce a lot of electricity. It is also said to be a "greener energy" as in the fact that its CO2 emissions are lower than that of oil and gas. They are generally safer as they do not break down as much and there are statisitics available that prove that people are more likely to die from a car accident than a nuclear meltdown.
yes, thermal nuclear reactors are safer than fossil power plants, dams, solar power, and coal mining.
if i knew i wouldnt be looking for the answer
The difference between Fusion and Fission is that Fission is easier to do and produces more energy than fusion reactions. However fission can be dangerous and is used in Nuclear reactors. Fusion however is safer and produces less energy but safely. It is quite difficult to cause a Fusion reaction however.
Wind energy is used to power things that need electric power (which can be made by wind energy). Its safer for the economy and it is unlimited and never runs out instead of stinking up the air and shortening lives of people due to asthma attacks and greenhouse gas emissions.
After about 1890, yes. The use of electricity for lights was far safer than the previous alternative of gas lamps.
Usually very, often safer than one near a coal plant.