The push-pull theory is used by scientists to explain how certain chemical signals attract or repel cells or molecules to guide their movement and positioning within biological systems. It helps to understand processes such as cell migration, neural development, and the establishment of tissue patterns during embryonic development.
Scientists make observations about the natural world through experiments and try to explain the phenomena that they observe. Scientists then attempt to explain the occurence of all of these observations in an overarching theory. For example, an observation would be seeing an apple fall to the ground and making measurements. The next step would be taking all of these observations which could include things such as the movement of planets and other cosmic bodies to form the theory of gravity which attempts to explain these observations.
Sometimes the scientists can't think of a suitable theory to explain their results but publish their experiments anyway to provide data for others so maybe another scientist can create a theory.
The theory used to explain changes in state is the Kinetic Molecular Theory. This theory states that the state of matter is determined by the movement and energy of its particles, with changes in state occurring when the particles gain or lose energy.
The microscope was the instrument used in the 18th and 19th centuries that helped scientists develop the cell theory. Scientists such as Robert Hooke and Anton van Leeuwenhoek were able to observe microscopic structures for the first time, leading to the discovery of cells and the development of the cell theory.
to explain the relationship
The push-pull theory is used by scientists to explain how certain chemical signals attract or repel cells or molecules to guide their movement and positioning within biological systems. It helps to understand processes such as cell migration, neural development, and the establishment of tissue patterns during embryonic development.
an educated guess
Instead of just stating his own personal opinions John Dalton cited evidence to support his atomic theory. The giving of evidence - which could be proved or disproved by others - was what soon resulted in his theory being accepted by scientists.
kinetic theory
Scientists make observations about the natural world through experiments and try to explain the phenomena that they observe. Scientists then attempt to explain the occurence of all of these observations in an overarching theory. For example, an observation would be seeing an apple fall to the ground and making measurements. The next step would be taking all of these observations which could include things such as the movement of planets and other cosmic bodies to form the theory of gravity which attempts to explain these observations.
theory is one
Imitationalism.
If you browse around this category, you will find several similar questions with replies that answer your query. ==================================== Real scientists do not "gather evidence in support of" any theory. The technical term for that kind of thing is "cherry-picking". Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they have already gathered, and then test the theory to see whether it holds water. The easiest, fastest way to make sure that you are regarded as a wingnut by real scientists is to adopt or invent a theory, and then spend your time trying to prove it.
Sometimes the scientists can't think of a suitable theory to explain their results but publish their experiments anyway to provide data for others so maybe another scientist can create a theory.
theory is one
theory