answersLogoWhite

0

1. It does not produce nuclear waste 2. It is free to run in terms of fuel costs 3. The operations are simple and do not need specially trained staff 4. There is no need for an expensive regulatory authority like the NRC 5. When the plant is worn out it can easily be dismantled and scrapped

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is nuclear power more powerful than hydro power?

No.


Why nuclear would not be a good alternative to hydroelectric power?

If hydro power is available, go for it. Most places don't have enough water or height to produce much hydro though. I hope nobody has built nuclear where hydro is available.


What are the types of electric power plants?

Nuclear, Thermal, Hydro, Windmill.


What are the common ways of getting electricity such as hydro electric power thermal power and nuclear power?

There are: Hydro electric, Nuclear, Solar, Wind, and Fossil fuels, Geo- thermal and Biofuels.Hydro electric has two categories : Tidal and Wave


What are the kind of power plant?

Coal fired, Nuclear Power, Gas Fired, Hydro, Wind Power.


What are the different kinds of power plants?

Coal fired, Nuclear Power, Gas Fired, Hydro, Wind Power.


How is nuclear power better than hydro electric power cost wise?

Hydro power depends on suitable water sources and terrain where you can build a dam to obtain the necessary head of water, so it can't be built anywhere, whereas a nuclear plant can be sited in most areas apart from earthquake zones, provided there is a supply of cooling water. So hydro is more limited in application, but I guess if there are the right conditions for building it, this will be the most economical in the long run, and there are no pollution worries. Nuclear plants should be compared with fossil fuel plants rather than hydro, as the choice is then more valid.


how is nuclear power better than hydro power cost wise?

Hydro power depends on suitable water sources and terrain where you can build a dam to obtain the necessary head of water, so it can't be built anywhere, whereas a nuclear plant can be sited in most areas apart from earthquake zones, provided there is a supply of cooling water. So hydro is more limited in application, but I guess if there are the right conditions for building it, this will be the most economical in the long run, and there are no pollution worries. Nuclear plants should be compared with fossil fuel plants rather than hydro, as the choice is then more valid.


Is hydro better than wind power?

yes


How is nuclear transported?

If you mean nuclear power, it is just regular electricity, so it's transmitted along regular hydro lines to the power plants, where it is distributed.


What are some major industries in Ontario?

Mining, Forestry, etc .


Is nuclear the best way to power electricity?

In my opinion the best way is hydro power, but there is not enough of it for all purposes