Hydro power depends on suitable water sources and terrain where you can build a dam to obtain the necessary head of water, so it can't be built anywhere, whereas a nuclear plant can be sited in most areas apart from earthquake zones, provided there is a supply of cooling water. So hydro is more limited in application, but I guess if there are the right conditions for building it, this will be the most economical in the long run, and there are no pollution worries. Nuclear plants should be compared with fossil fuel plants rather than hydro, as the choice is then more valid.
There are: Hydro electric, Nuclear, Solar, Wind, and Fossil fuels, Geo- thermal and Biofuels.Hydro electric has two categories : Tidal and Wave
Nuclear, Thermal, Hydro, Windmill.
Burning fossil fuels or creating hydro electric power systems are currently the only viable alternatives to nuclear power in terms of the amount of power generated.
Dams can be used to produce hydro electric power
hydro electric power plant
Hydro Electric Power
Indias hydro-electric power is not poor it just is of poor quality.
hydro electic is a power source but you have to build a dam
No.
Hydro electric power are very common in because they are cheap and more available source of power
millions
32 countries in the world are using nuclear electric power.