All it takes is new data.
A theory and a law serve different purposes in science. A theory explains why something happens based on evidence and research, while a law describes a phenomenon or pattern observed in nature without necessarily explaining why it occurs. Therefore, a theory cannot "become" a law because they are fundamentally different in terms of their function and scope.
A scientific law is the description of a recurring event that occurs in nature. A scientific theory is an explanation of the law. The law does not change, but the theory may change when new data indicate that it needs to.
A theory that has been confirmed through rigorous testing and observation is typically referred to as a scientific law.
A scientific theory is an explanation supported by evidence and can be modified as new evidence is discovered. A scientific law is a description of a natural phenomenon that is consistent and often expressed mathematically, without explaining why it happens.
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
science
they both can be changed in time.
Law is a permanently fixed thing which is accepted worldwide and can be hardly changed while theory is an accepted phenomenon and followed by few and may be changed easily.
yes that is y it is a theory a law can not b changed or the entire thing is false
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
Continuing research can turn up new or conflicting information regarding a theory or scientific law. It will then be changed even after general acceptance.
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
a law has been tested over and over agian and is a very certain concept and is not likely to change. a theory on the other hand is more likely to be corrected and changed, like the theory of relativity, although it is the best description of physics we have now, it is still likely to be changed someday
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.
A scientic law is universal and it formed after various tried and tested experiments .We also know its limtations and conditions .it cannot be changed .Example , Mendels law , newtons law of gravitation etc whereas theory generalise the constant results of experiments , theories can be improved and changed .example Darwin's theory of evolution On the other hand ,law cant be changed.