The acceleration is 9.8 m/s2.
The force of gravity on the 10kg brick is 98N. This is because the force of gravity is directly proportional to the mass of the object, and in this case, it is 10 times greater than the force of gravity on the 1kg book.
It depends where the vaccum is (i.e. gravity depends on the interaction of local masses in space). The force of gravity is not affected by the presence or lack of air, thus a vacuum is inconsequential to the answer. Not to mention, why even add the detail of the 1kg book if it never comes up again. Please formulate a serious question. The answer is as simple as plugging in the corresponding local masses (or those you care about) into: Force = (G*M1*M2)/r^2 G being the gravitational constant M1 being mass 1 M2 being mass 2 r being the distance between the center of masses of mass 1 and mass 2 Go to high school, kthx.
Well if we use work = force * distance we have the distance but not the force. We have to use another equation f=ma (force = mass*acceleration) where the acceleration is gravity (9.8 m/s or 10 if you are rounding). Not using rounding: m=10 a=9.8 therefore 10*9.8=98N=force We then input that into our work formula: force = 98 distance = 5 therefore 98*5 = 490J = work without rounding that would simply be 500J Hope this helps!
N stands for newton, the unit of force - this already is a force, no need to convert anything.
<p> Mass and weight are different physical quantities, Weight is dependent on the gravitational force which the planet on which the object is located applies, while mass is independent of this force, and is the actual 'matter content' of the object. There will be a change in weight of the object if taken on the moon, but the mass will remain unaffected. Mass 10kg implies: Weight (on Earth) = 10*9.8 = 98N As the gravitational force of moon is 1/6th pf that of earth, the weight of that object on Moon will be: 98* (1/6) = 98/6 = 16.33N *The mass will remain unchanged on the moon. </p>
The force of gravity on the 10kg brick is 98N. This is because the force of gravity is directly proportional to the mass of the object, and in this case, it is 10 times greater than the force of gravity on the 1kg book.
It depends where the vaccum is (i.e. gravity depends on the interaction of local masses in space). The force of gravity is not affected by the presence or lack of air, thus a vacuum is inconsequential to the answer. Not to mention, why even add the detail of the 1kg book if it never comes up again. Please formulate a serious question. The answer is as simple as plugging in the corresponding local masses (or those you care about) into: Force = (G*M1*M2)/r^2 G being the gravitational constant M1 being mass 1 M2 being mass 2 r being the distance between the center of masses of mass 1 and mass 2 Go to high school, kthx.
Well if we use work = force * distance we have the distance but not the force. We have to use another equation f=ma (force = mass*acceleration) where the acceleration is gravity (9.8 m/s or 10 if you are rounding). Not using rounding: m=10 a=9.8 therefore 10*9.8=98N=force We then input that into our work formula: force = 98 distance = 5 therefore 98*5 = 490J = work without rounding that would simply be 500J Hope this helps!
N stands for newton, the unit of force - this already is a force, no need to convert anything.
Although generally accepted as synonymous, mass and weight are not scientifically the same things. While mass may be defined as the amount of matter in a body, weight is actually a force that arises due to the gravitational pull of the Earth. While mass remains practically constant under normal conditions, the weight changes as the gravitational pull changes. If a bag of groceries has a mass of 10kg, then it's weight maybe calculated using the relation W=m*g (* denotes multiplication), where W is the weight (to be found), m is the mass (=10kg in this case) and 'g' is the acceleration due to gravity whose value on earth surface is approximately 9.8m/s2. This value is practically constant on the earth surface but varies with height and depth. On the moon it's value is 1/6 of the value on earth. Thus the weight of the bag on earth works out to be 9.8*10=98N. N stands for Newton after the scientist who gave the concept of force. It is the unit of force in the S.I system and it's value equals 1kg*m/s2.
<p> Mass and weight are different physical quantities, Weight is dependent on the gravitational force which the planet on which the object is located applies, while mass is independent of this force, and is the actual 'matter content' of the object. There will be a change in weight of the object if taken on the moon, but the mass will remain unaffected. Mass 10kg implies: Weight (on Earth) = 10*9.8 = 98N As the gravitational force of moon is 1/6th pf that of earth, the weight of that object on Moon will be: 98* (1/6) = 98/6 = 16.33N *The mass will remain unchanged on the moon. </p>
The relationship between mass and weight is that mass is constant in any environment, whereas weight changes from planet to planet because the gravitational pull is different, from which the weight depends on.
On the moon, 10 kg of mass weighs 16.2 newtons (3.65 pounds). (rounded)
98 newtons is equivalent to approximately 22 pounds.
-23. If the second number had been -1 there would have been a much simpler answer, but it was not so that is irrelevant. To get -23, fit the polynomial: t(n) = (- n4 + 13n3 - 59n2 + 98n - 45)/3 for n = 1, 2, 3, ...
it could be bad spark plugs, corroded, worn, old, dirty, or could be the spark plugs wires, old, damaged, loose, or in the last case bad coil packs or bad ecm, you can diagnose it with a scanner OBD2 and get the code, to research for especific misfiring code related to your problem to pimpoint exactly the cause of the misfire. ha ha ha reddragon
175R14C (175/80R14). Load rating (99/98N) 8ply VAN tyre Not easy to find this size and load rsting any more from the premium brands. Yokohama R818 is available via National Tyres; Barum (part on Continental tyres) do one, so do Hankook. Kumho tyres mid-range/mid-price Korean brand. Quite a few budget brands still doing this size/load, but generally these are Chinese manufacture and Chinese tyres don't seem to perform well in brake testing - in the CAR tyre reviews by Which/EVO, etc.