gravity
It takes more force to get an object moving because you need to overcome its initial inertia, which is the resistance of the object to changes in its motion. Once the object is moving, it requires less force to keep it in motion because there is less resistance once it has overcome the inertia.
Yes, according to Newton's first law of motion, an object will remain in its state of motion (either at rest or moving at a constant velocity) unless acted upon by an external force. In order to keep an object moving, a force must be continuously applied to overcome any friction or resistance that might slow it down.
No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.
The centripetal force required to keep an object moving in a circle increases as the velocity of the object increases. This is because a higher velocity means there is a greater tendency for the object to move in a straight line, requiring a stronger force to keep it moving in a circle. In other words, centripetal force is directly proportional to the square of the velocity of the object.
Yes, to keep an object moving in a circle, a force must be exerted towards the center of the circle. This is known as centripetal force.
Force is never needed to keep an object moving unless there is an opposite force trying to slow the object.
An object which is moving doesn't need a force to keep it moving.
the heavier and the bigger the object the more force you need to use to keep it moving . the less weight and the smaller an object is the less force you need to use to keep it moving. it always depends on the weight of the object and the size of the object.
The best, purest answer is: Because no force at all is required to keep a moving object moving.
to keep an object moving the way it is already moving .
It takes more force to get an object moving because you need to overcome its initial inertia, which is the resistance of the object to changes in its motion. Once the object is moving, it requires less force to keep it in motion because there is less resistance once it has overcome the inertia.
No force is needed to keep an object moving. An object with no forces on it keeps moving at a constant speed in a straight line. If there is any force acting on it to make it slow down, then you need just enough force to cancel the first one, in order to keep it moving.
Yes, according to Newton's first law of motion, an object will remain in its state of motion (either at rest or moving at a constant velocity) unless acted upon by an external force. In order to keep an object moving, a force must be continuously applied to overcome any friction or resistance that might slow it down.
No force is needed to keep an object moving. An object with no forces on it keeps moving at a constant speed in a straight line. If there is any force acting on it to make it slow down, then you need just enough force to cancel the first one, in order to keep it moving.
the same force and dahni is awesome
No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.No. It takes a force to put something in motion, and it takes force to stop it. To keep it moving requires zero force. If there is no opposing friction force, it will continue moving forever. If you can significantly reduce the friction, a small force can keep an object moving - just enough to counteract the force of friction.
The centripetal force required to keep an object moving in a circle increases as the velocity of the object increases. This is because a higher velocity means there is a greater tendency for the object to move in a straight line, requiring a stronger force to keep it moving in a circle. In other words, centripetal force is directly proportional to the square of the velocity of the object.