According to Einstein's theory of relativity, as an object with mass approaches the speed of light, its mass would increase infinitely and it would require infinite energy to accelerate further. Therefore, it is impossible for Albert to ride a beam of light as he has mass.
If light could not be refracted, it would not be able to change direction when it passes from one medium to another, such as from air to water. This would result in light traveling in a straight line only and could have significant impacts on how lenses, prisms, and other optical devices function. The phenomenon of dispersion, where light splits into different colors, also relies on refraction, so that would not occur.
Albert Einstein developed the special theory of relativity by considering the behavior of light in relation to moving observers. Through thought experiments and mathematical calculations, he derived the famous equation E=mc^2, which describes the equivalence of mass and energy.
Nazis would be the answer you are looking for.
I would ask Einstein about his thought process and how he approached solving complex problems. Additionally, I would inquire about his views on the intersection between science and philosophy, and how he maintained his curiosity and creativity throughout his life.
If the amplitude of the waves coming from a light bulb decreases, you would expect the intensity of the light emitted to decrease as well. This would result in the light appearing dimmer to an observer.
It would turn to energy
First of all, how would you go about to do that? I don't think that is even possible.
If Albert Einstein never lived:America would have never layed the atomic bomb on Japan so the war could turn out different.We would never know the speed of light(E=mc2)We wouldn't know how to eat soupBALLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :p
They would die.
If light could not be refracted, it would not be able to change direction when it passes from one medium to another, such as from air to water. This would result in light traveling in a straight line only and could have significant impacts on how lenses, prisms, and other optical devices function. The phenomenon of dispersion, where light splits into different colors, also relies on refraction, so that would not occur.
It is the only source of light!
There would hardly be any light!
Nothing would happen.
If glycolysis could not happen in a cell, the cell would not produce ATP molecules.
US Scientists in New Mexico (the Manhattan Project) and Albert Einstein had a say in it as well. he thought that you could split the atom but a huge force would happen but he thought nobody would be stupid enough to try it out.
The one in the light would grow better.
it would be ok in a circuit which didn't need a light bulb.