Must balance the counter clockwise torque.
no because to get a torque you must multiply lever arm by force. If lever is zero, then torque is zero
No, a body cannot be in equilibrium while revolving clockwise under the action of a single torque. In order to be in equilibrium, the net torque acting on the body must be zero, which is not the case when a single torque is causing the body to rotate.
In a condition of equilibrium, the sum of all torques acting on an object must be zero because torque is responsible for rotation. If the total torque is not balanced (i.e., not zero), the object will start rotating. By ensuring that the sum of all torques is zero, we guarantee that the object stays in a stable, balanced position without any rotational movement.
No, for an object to be in equilibrium, the net torque acting on it must be zero. If all torques are producing clockwise rotation, there will be a net torque causing the object to rotate in that direction, not in equilibrium.
The condition for a system to be dynamically balanced is that the sum of the moments (forces multiplied by their distances) acting on the system must be zero. This means that the system is in rotational equilibrium, with no net torque acting on it.
no because to get a torque you must multiply lever arm by force. If lever is zero, then torque is zero
A fulcrum would be placed as close to the heavy load as possible. This minimizes the lever arm (and thus minimizes the torque) for the load while maximizing the lever arm (and thus maximizing the torque) for the force you must apply.
No, a body cannot be in equilibrium while revolving clockwise under the action of a single torque. In order to be in equilibrium, the net torque acting on the body must be zero, which is not the case when a single torque is causing the body to rotate.
In a condition of equilibrium, the sum of all torques acting on an object must be zero because torque is responsible for rotation. If the total torque is not balanced (i.e., not zero), the object will start rotating. By ensuring that the sum of all torques is zero, we guarantee that the object stays in a stable, balanced position without any rotational movement.
No, for an object to be in equilibrium, the net torque acting on it must be zero. If all torques are producing clockwise rotation, there will be a net torque causing the object to rotate in that direction, not in equilibrium.
Yes. For the object not to move, two conditions must be satisfied: (1) The vector sum of forces must be zero, and (2) The vector sum of torques must be zero. Do some reading on torque, for more information.
On prop driven aircraft the torque created by the engine, along with other forces, creates a left turning tendency. The pilot must compensate for this by adding right rudder. Keep in mind that on US prop built aircraft the prop turns clockwise (as seen from the cockpit) and the prop torque is as stated above. However, on many European designed aircraft, the prop turns counter clockwise and therefore, the prop torque produces a right turning tendency.
The condition for a system to be dynamically balanced is that the sum of the moments (forces multiplied by their distances) acting on the system must be zero. This means that the system is in rotational equilibrium, with no net torque acting on it.
90 / 1200 meter, or 0.075 of a meter.
For an object to be at equilibrium, the net force acting on it must be zero, which means that the forces are balanced and cancel each other out. Additionally, the object must not be accelerating, so the net torque acting on it must also be zero.
Everyone must eat a balanced diet. No exceptions.
For a body to be in equilibrium, the net force acting on it must be zero, meaning that the forces in all directions are balanced. Additionally, the net torque (or rotational force) acting on the body must also be zero, ensuring that it is not rotating.