first of all, you'll have to tell abt the type of motion you are dealing with.
whether its linear or rotational or simple harmonic.
In a simple harmonic system, K.E and P.E becomes when the body has a displacement = A/(root of 2), where A=amplitude.
When an object is stationary in a plane, (no hill or slope) then potential energy and kinetic energy are equal. Following the case, if an object is stationary at the top of a hill, it has stored energy (potential energy) due to gravitational attraction, as the force of gravity attracts the object towards the ground and once the object gets some kind of motion, all those potential energy will change to kinetic energy.
****************************
Actually, the Object CAN be moving, but it is moving Parallel to its Reference Frame, and at a Constant Velocity.
When the velocity of the object and the velocity of the observer are equal,
according to some grand omniscient higher observer.
Under those conditions, the observer would say that the object is "at rest"
and its kinetic energy is zero, in his particular little world.
When there is no friction losses in the system.
When it is half way to the ground.
We don't think you can. Here's our reasoning: -- Kinetic energy of an object is [(1/2)(mass)(speed)2]. If kinetic energy is not zero, then mass can't be zero, and speed can't be zero either. -- Momentum of the object is [(mass)(speed)]. If mass isn't zero and speed isn't zero, then momentum isn't zero.
Yes! Absolute zero has minimal kinetic energy.
Absolute zero. On the Kelvin scale of heat measurement, 0K is the point at which no more energy can be removed or −273.15°C / −459.67°F. There is not enough energy there at 0K to transfer any movement from the substance to another substance.
This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.
An object with zero kinetic energy is at rest. However, since reference frames are relative, the calculation of kinetic energy is done with reference to an arbitrary point.
kinetic energy is zero when the body is at rest.
actually total energy is the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy....potential energy= -2*kinetic energy . By using this relation you will get that sum of potential and kinetic energy is equal to the magnitude of kinetic energy and it is less than zero...hope this will be enough for you....
The kinetic energy of the car becomes zero when the car halts. If it halts on top of a hill, the energy changes to potential energy.
We don't think you can. Here's our reasoning: -- Kinetic energy of an object is [(1/2)(mass)(speed)2]. If kinetic energy is not zero, then mass can't be zero, and speed can't be zero either. -- Momentum of the object is [(mass)(speed)]. If mass isn't zero and speed isn't zero, then momentum isn't zero.
No solution. Zero momentum (MV) means either zero mass or zero velocity. Either one results in zero kinetic energy (1/2 MV2).
It equals basic energy
1
No. Kinetic energy would be zero in both cases. The book in the higher position has more potential energy.No. Kinetic energy would be zero in both cases. The book in the higher position has more potential energy.No. Kinetic energy would be zero in both cases. The book in the higher position has more potential energy.No. Kinetic energy would be zero in both cases. The book in the higher position has more potential energy.
Kinetic energy is dependent on which point you are talking about. When it is about to be dropped, kinetic energy is zero. When it reaches almost hits the ground, there is maximum kinetic energy.
Yes! Absolute zero has minimal kinetic energy.
Absolute zero. On the Kelvin scale of heat measurement, 0K is the point at which no more energy can be removed or −273.15°C / −459.67°F. There is not enough energy there at 0K to transfer any movement from the substance to another substance.
This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.