Any energy source that is obtained from animal or plant matter, excluding fossilised material, is considered biomass energy. So, anything that's not that, including oil, coal, gas, and nuclear energy.
Yes, atomic energy is considered a non-conventional source of energy. It is derived from nuclear reactions, specifically fission or fusion processes, and is different from conventional sources like fossil fuels or renewable energy sources.
Non-conventional sources of energy are generally considered better because they are renewable and have lower environmental impacts compared to conventional sources such as fossil fuels. Non-conventional sources like solar, wind, and hydro power offer sustainable alternatives for the future.
There is no absolute hard and fast definition. But I would say coal, oil, and natural gas, and hydro are conventional. Wind, solar, tidal, and biomass non-conventional. I'm not sure about nuclear.
Nuclear power is considered a conventional source of energy because it has been used for several decades on a large scale to generate electricity. Non-conventional sources of energy typically refer to renewable sources like solar, wind, and hydropower.
Conventional sources of energy include fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) and nuclear energy. These sources have been traditionally used to generate electricity, power vehicles, and provide heat for residential and industrial applications.
You don't. There is no difference in the type of energy, between the "conventional" and "non-conventional" types. What makes energy conventional or non-conventional is the SOURCE - a conventional source being one that has been used for a long time.
Currently, human's conventional source of energy is fossil fuel.
No, wind energy is a non-conventional, or unconventional source of energy. Conventional sources of energy are coal, oil, natural gas and uranium.
A conventional source of energy would be one that has been in use for quite a while - say, for a few decades at least, and on a sufficiently large scale. This is not the case with lightning.A conventional source of energy would be one that has been in use for quite a while - say, for a few decades at least, and on a sufficiently large scale. This is not the case with lightning.A conventional source of energy would be one that has been in use for quite a while - say, for a few decades at least, and on a sufficiently large scale. This is not the case with lightning.A conventional source of energy would be one that has been in use for quite a while - say, for a few decades at least, and on a sufficiently large scale. This is not the case with lightning.
no clue seriously
wind
non conventional energy = renewable energy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy
dvszfvdvfdv
the bio gas that the algae produce is the energy source.
This is difficult to decide I think. It has been available for 50 years now - does that make it conventional? It is a well established and reliable energy source.
Conventional energy source - Gasoline and other petroleum products like diesel etc. They are derived from Coal and fossil fuels. Non - Conventional energy source - Solar Power, Wind energy (Using wind mills), hydro - electricity, Bio Gas etc.
Yes, atomic energy is considered a non-conventional source of energy. It is derived from nuclear reactions, specifically fission or fusion processes, and is different from conventional sources like fossil fuels or renewable energy sources.