In Rutherford's gold foil experiment atoms are mostly empty space.
Repeating an experiment helps to ensure the results are reliable and not just due to chance. Consistent results across multiple trials strengthen the conclusions drawn from the study and increase confidence in the findings.
Results that are consistent or reproducible across multiple trials are considered reliable in an experiment. These results should not change regardless of any variations in experimental conditions or procedures. Additionally, results that align with the expected outcomes based on the hypothesis and theoretical framework also typically remain constant.
The answer you predict before starting the experiment is your hypothesis.
The results of Rutherford's gold foil experiment supported the model of an atom with a small, positively charged nucleus at its center, surrounded by mostly empty space where electrons orbit. This experiment led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
Repeatability is crucial for an experiment to ensure that the results are consistent and reliable. By allowing other researchers to replicate the experiment and obtain the same results, it helps to validate the findings and ensure that they are not due to chance or errors. Additionally, repeatability allows for further testing and refinement of the experiment, contributing to the overall understanding and advancement of the scientific knowledge in that area.
The most surprising fact about Rutherford's experiment is that some of the atoms bounced backwards while others scattered.
The gold foil experiment supported the statement that atoms have a small, positively charged nucleus at their center. This overturned the previous "plum pudding" model of the atom, where positive charge was thought to be spread throughout the atom.
That is not a statement it is a question
No
false
Repeating an experiment helps to ensure the results are reliable and not just due to chance. Consistent results across multiple trials strengthen the conclusions drawn from the study and increase confidence in the findings.
No, I believe that would be a hypothesis. A prediction would be forecasting the unknown without the assistance of the results.
Results that are consistent or reproducible across multiple trials are considered reliable in an experiment. These results should not change regardless of any variations in experimental conditions or procedures. Additionally, results that align with the expected outcomes based on the hypothesis and theoretical framework also typically remain constant.
Religion is important during an experiment because it tells you if the results are consistent. If you didn't repeat portions of the experiment, than you wouldn't be able to gain accurate results.
The intra-assay coefficient of variation for this experiment is a measure of the variability within the same assay or test, indicating how consistent the results are.
The answer you predict before starting the experiment is your hypothesis.
Repeatability is crucial for an experiment to ensure that the results are consistent and reliable. By allowing other researchers to replicate the experiment and obtain the same results, it helps to validate the findings and ensure that they are not due to chance or errors. Additionally, repeatability allows for further testing and refinement of the experiment, contributing to the overall understanding and advancement of the scientific knowledge in that area.