The ancient Greek philosopher Democritus proposed that matter is composed of indivisible particles called atoms, a theory that is similar to the modern atomic theory in physics. His ideas on the existence of atoms and their properties foreshadowed many aspects of today's scientific understanding of matter and its structure.
bob
bob
The ideas about matter proposed by Democritus in ancient Greece were most similar to what scientists use today. Democritus believed that matter is made up of tiny, indivisible particles called atoms, which is consistent with our modern understanding of matter at the atomic and subatomic levels. His ideas laid the foundation for the development of modern atomic theory.
Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and lacked empty spaces, while scientists today understand matter to be composed of atoms and molecules with spaces between them. Additionally, Aristotle viewed matter as having inherent qualities and tendencies, whereas modern science explains matter in terms of interactions between fundamental particles governed by physical laws.
Einstein's contributions to physics, especially his theories of relativity and E=mc^2, revolutionized our understanding of the universe. His work paved the way for numerous scientific advancements, such as nuclear energy and GPS technology. Moreover, his ideas continue to inspire scientists and thinkers to explore the mysteries of the cosmos.
bob
bob
The ideas about matter proposed by Democritus in ancient Greece were most similar to what scientists use today. Democritus believed that matter is made up of tiny, indivisible particles called atoms, which is consistent with our modern understanding of matter at the atomic and subatomic levels. His ideas laid the foundation for the development of modern atomic theory.
I think so
op[iu
becuase of simalarities
I think the question is a bit mixed up, but I think this is the answer. Scientists talk about "mass-energy" as a unified thing. Just after the Big Bang "energy", in the form of radiation energy, was dominant. However, today it seems that "mass" is the dominant form. In other words, "matter" now dominates the Universe. There is the complication of "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy". Cosmologists still don't really know what these are. So that puts some uncertainty into this discussion of matter and energy. Some scientists believe that it is now "energy" that dominates, because of the discovery of Dark Energy. (Also, cosmologists think that both "matter" and "anti-matter" were created, but that there was a slight imbalance in favour of matter and the anti-matter seems to have been destroyed, leaving just "matter".)
first of all they have to follow the scientific method. then they have to publish it in a scientific journal. then it has to gain publicity and be replicated by multiple scientists
the silly
Scientists believe that changes in the Earth's climate cause extinction of trees;P
I think because much of his inventions are used a lot today.
Scientists today rely heavily on empirical evidence, experimentation, and peer review to develop and validate their ideas, while Greek philosophers used more deductive reasoning, logic, and thought experiments. Additionally, modern scientists work within established frameworks and theories, building on existing knowledge through collaboration and specialization, whereas Greek philosophers often sought universal truths through individual contemplation and debate.