The Expanding Earth theory was rejected by the scientific community because it lacked substantial evidence and could not explain key geological phenomena, such as the movement of tectonic plates and the distribution of fossils across continents. Additionally, the theory did not align with established principles of plate tectonics and the understanding of Earth's structure and composition.
His first scientific paper was on the Photoelectric Effect, this was one of the founding theories that ultimately lead to Quantum Mechanics (a theory that Einstein rejected).
If I understand the question correctly, you are asking whether a scientify *theory* can be revised as new evidence is presented, and the answer is YES. This forms the entire foundation of science - any theory that cannot be revised is contrary to the scientific method; it has, in effect, become dogma. Any theory that cannot be demonstrated through the available evidence must be rejected. So, if a scientist discovers new data that invalidates a previously working theory, then that theory is rejected by the scientific community.
A scientific theory is a theory that explains the scientist's observations, whereas a scientific law is a repeated pattern in the world that we have not sought an explanation for.Also, a scientific theory is proven correct in this time, but may not be correct during future times.
A proposed scientific idea is called a hypothesis. This is a tentative explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through observations and experiments. If the hypothesis is supported by evidence, it may become a theory in the scientific community.
The process of developing and accepting a scientific theory can vary widely depending on the complexity of the theory and the evidence supporting it. Some theories can be developed in a relatively short time, while others may take years or even decades. Acceptance of a theory by the scientific community depends on the strength of the evidence, the ability of the theory to explain observations, and its ability to make accurate predictions.
The Big Bang theory is widely accepted in the scientific community as the most plausible explanation for the origins of the universe. While there may be ongoing debates and refinements to the theory, it has not been rejected as a whole.
Yes, a scientific theory can be rejected if new evidence or observations contradict its predictions or if a more accurate theory is developed. The rejection of a theory is an essential part of the scientific process that helps refine our understanding of the natural world.
A hypothesis will be rejected if it fails the necessary testing required for it to become a scientific theory.
how well existing scientific data are explained by the new theory.
constant
Alfred Wegener was the proponent of the Continental Drift Theory. The scientific community accepted this theory due to the phenomena of paleomagnetism, sea floor spreading and plate tectonics.
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
The theory that is widely accepted as true in the scientific community is known as the scientific theory. This type of theory is based on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation, and has withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
after it has been evaluated and tested repeatedly
The merit of a new scientific theory is judged by the scientific community based on its ability to explain existing data, make testable predictions, and withstand rigorous scrutiny through peer review and replication of results. The theory's coherence, explanatory power, and ability to advance our understanding of the natural world are also important factors in determining its acceptance within the scientific community.