A bus has more kinetic energy than a bicycle because it has greater mass and moves at a higher speed. Kinetic energy is proportional to mass and velocity squared, so the larger mass and higher speed of the bus contribute to its greater kinetic energy compared to a bicycle.
A truck moving at 60 mph has more kinetic mechanical energy than a bicycle moving at 15 mph due to the truck's higher mass and velocity. Kinetic energy is proportional to an object's mass and to the square of its velocity.
A train has more kinetic energy than a car traveling at the same speed because the train has significantly more mass. Kinetic energy is directly proportional to an object's mass - the more mass an object has, the more kinetic energy it will possess at a given speed.
The object with particles having more kinetic energy will have a higher temperature than the object with particles having less kinetic energy.
No, a bowling ball has more kinetic energy than a golf ball due to its greater mass and velocity. Kinetic energy is directly proportional to the mass and the square of the velocity of an object, so the heavier and faster-moving object will have greater kinetic energy.
Yes, it is possible to have more kinetic energy than potential energy. Kinetic energy is associated with the motion of an object, while potential energy is associated with its position or state. For example, in free fall, an object has maximum kinetic energy and minimal potential energy at the bottom of its trajectory.
A train has more kinetic energy than a car traveling at the same speed because the train has significantly more mass. Kinetic energy is directly proportional to an object's mass - the more mass an object has, the more kinetic energy it will possess at a given speed.
A truck moving at 60 mph has more kinetic mechanical energy than a bicycle moving at 15 mph due to the truck's higher mass and velocity. Kinetic energy is proportional to an object's mass and to the square of its velocity.
Im so confused
The object with particles having more kinetic energy will have a higher temperature than the object with particles having less kinetic energy.
No, a bowling ball has more kinetic energy than a golf ball due to its greater mass and velocity. Kinetic energy is directly proportional to the mass and the square of the velocity of an object, so the heavier and faster-moving object will have greater kinetic energy.
Yes, it is possible to have more kinetic energy than potential energy. Kinetic energy is associated with the motion of an object, while potential energy is associated with its position or state. For example, in free fall, an object has maximum kinetic energy and minimal potential energy at the bottom of its trajectory.
Of course not. A battleship in motion has more kinetic energy than a housefly in motion has.
Rapidly moving comets have more kinetic energy compared to slowly moving ones. Kinetic energy is the energy of motion, and it increases with an object's velocity.
Gravity is a force more so than an energy
Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv2 where m = mass and v = velocity A train has much more mass than a car. So even if they are travelling at the same speed, a train will have more kinetic energy than a car.
There would be more gravitational potential energy than kinetic energy when an object is at a high elevation or position above the ground, where the gravitational potential energy is proportional to the height of the object. As the object falls, the potential energy is converted to kinetic energy, so at any point during the fall, the sum of potential and kinetic energy remains constant.
faster atoms have more kinetic energy than slower atoms do.