IT IS NEcssary to create non conventional sources because they help to
Non-conventional sources of energy are generally considered better because they are renewable and have lower environmental impacts compared to conventional sources such as fossil fuels. Non-conventional sources like solar, wind, and hydro power offer sustainable alternatives for the future.
Conventional energy sources are traditional sources like fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) and nuclear power. Non-conventional energy sources are renewable sources like solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro power that are more sustainable and environmentally friendly. Conventional sources are finite and contribute to pollution, while non-conventional sources are more sustainable and have lower environmental impact.
Conventional sources of energy have been in use for a long time that usually cause pollution and are exhaustible. Non-conventional sources, meanwhile, are recent sources of energy that are inexhaustible and pollution-free.
There is no absolute hard and fast definition. But I would say coal, oil, and natural gas, and hydro are conventional. Wind, solar, tidal, and biomass non-conventional. I'm not sure about nuclear.
Conventional energy sources are coal, oil, natural gas, and hydraulic energy sources.Non conventional energy sources are nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, wave, tide, and biomass energy sources.
we need these sources because these sources are recycle-able. This fact makes non conventional sources are most beneficial and useful. the conventional sources are very rare in this word and nearly will finished and these can't recycle.
Sources of what?
Non-conventional sources of energy are generally considered better because they are renewable and have lower environmental impacts compared to conventional sources such as fossil fuels. Non-conventional sources like solar, wind, and hydro power offer sustainable alternatives for the future.
"In Good Hands" is an example of a catchy slogan on conventional sources. "American By Birth Rebel By Choice" is an example of the non-convectional sources slogan.
Conventional energy sources are traditional sources like fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) and nuclear power. Non-conventional energy sources are renewable sources like solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro power that are more sustainable and environmentally friendly. Conventional sources are finite and contribute to pollution, while non-conventional sources are more sustainable and have lower environmental impact.
Conventional sources of energy have been in use for a long time that usually cause pollution and are exhaustible. Non-conventional sources, meanwhile, are recent sources of energy that are inexhaustible and pollution-free.
Yes, but all the world's attention is on the reverse, the replacement of conventional energy by non-conventional, so I don't see the point of the question
how convert conveniotional energy into non conventional energy
Probably if it becomes popular, it would no longer be called "non-conventional".
There is no absolute hard and fast definition. But I would say coal, oil, and natural gas, and hydro are conventional. Wind, solar, tidal, and biomass non-conventional. I'm not sure about nuclear.
Conventional energy sources are coal, oil, natural gas, and hydraulic energy sources.Non conventional energy sources are nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, wave, tide, and biomass energy sources.
Only by being unusual or used in an unusual way.