answersLogoWhite

0

I think mainly because of the history of its use in WW2 as a weapon, this was the first time the general public were aware of nuclear power and the fear of its use in wartime has meant a continuing suspicion of it and scientists involved. As an industrial process for producing electricity it might not have attracted such suspicion if it had never been used as a weapon. It has a pretty good record of safety, even with the Chernobyl disaster having occurred, compared with other high energy industries such as coal mining. As an example of what can happen with industrial processes, take the example of the Union Carbide plant explosion in India (I forget the year). About 4000 people died due to exposure to dioxins, this was far worse than Chernobyl.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Physics

Why is nuclear energy controversial?

Nuclear energy is controversial due to concerns about safety, particularly after accidents such as Chernobyl and Fukushima. There are also issues related to nuclear waste disposal, cost, and potential nuclear proliferation risks. Additionally, some people worry about the long-term environmental impact of nuclear power plants.


Which countries operate commercial nuclear reactors?

See www.world-nuclear.org for country by country information:INFORMATION PAPERSNUCLEAR BASICSOutline History of Nuclear Energy The Nuclear Debate GlossaryFACTS AND FIGURESWorld Nuclear Power Reactors 2008-09 and Uranium Requirements Nuclear share figures, 1998-2008 - May 2009 Uranium production figures, 1998-2008 - June 2009COUNTRY AND REGIONAL BRIEFINGSUranium in Africa Nuclear Power in Argentina Nuclear Power in Armenia Australia's Uranium Nuclear Energy Prospects in Australia Nuclear Power in Belgium Nuclear Power in Brazil Nuclear Power in Bulgaria California's Electricity Nuclear Power in Canada Nuclear Power in Canada Appendix 1: Ontario Energy Policy Nuclear Power in Canada Appendix 2: Alberta Tar Sands Uranium in Canada Uranium in Canada Appendix 1: Brief History of Uranium Mining in Canada Uranium in Central Asia Nuclear Power in China Nuclear Power in China Appendix 1: Government Structure and Ownership China's Nuclear Fuel Cycle Nuclear Power in Czech Republic Nuclear Energy in Denmark Nuclear Power in Finland Nuclear Power in France Nuclear Power in Germany Nuclear Power in Hungary Nuclear Power in India Nuclear Energy in Iran Nuclear Power in Italy Nuclear Power in Japan Uranium and Nuclear Power in Kazakhstan Nuclear Power in Korea Nuclear Power in Lithuania Nuclear Power in Mexico Uranium in Namibia Nuclear Energy Prospects in New Zealand Nuclear Power in the Netherlands Uranium in Niger Nuclear Power in Pakistan Nuclear Power in Romania Nuclear Power in Russia Nuclear Power in Slovakia Nuclear Power in Slovenia Nuclear Power in South Africa Nuclear Power in Spain Nuclear Power in Sweden Nuclear Power in Sweden Appendix 1: Barsebäck Closure Nuclear Power in Switzerland Nuclear Power in Taiwan Nuclear Power in the United Kingdom Nuclear Power in Ukraine Nuclear Power in United Arab Emirates Nuclear Power in the USA Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 1: US Operating Nuclear Reactors Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 2 Power Plant Purchases: Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 3: COL Applications US Nuclear Fuel Cycle US Nuclear Fuel Cycle Appendix 1: US Uranium Mining and Exploration US Nuclear Power Policy Emerging Nuclear Energy Countries


What is true about nuclear power?

Nuclear power is a low-carbon energy source that can generate significant amounts of electricity. It produces a large amount of energy from a small amount of fuel, but also comes with challenges such as radioactive waste disposal and the potential for accidents. Overall, it is a controversial energy source with both benefits and risks.


Does Sydney have a nuclear power station?

No, Sydney does not have a nuclear power station. Australia does not have any operational nuclear power plants.


When was Hartlepool Nuclear Power Station created?

Hartlepool Nuclear Power Station was created in 1983.

Related Questions

Why is nuclear energy controversial?

Nuclear energy is controversial due to concerns about safety, particularly after accidents such as Chernobyl and Fukushima. There are also issues related to nuclear waste disposal, cost, and potential nuclear proliferation risks. Additionally, some people worry about the long-term environmental impact of nuclear power plants.


Why was the Manhattan project controversial?

The Manhattan project was controversial because the result was the production of very dangerous nuclear bombs.


Which countries operate commercial nuclear reactors?

See www.world-nuclear.org for country by country information:INFORMATION PAPERSNUCLEAR BASICSOutline History of Nuclear Energy The Nuclear Debate GlossaryFACTS AND FIGURESWorld Nuclear Power Reactors 2008-09 and Uranium Requirements Nuclear share figures, 1998-2008 - May 2009 Uranium production figures, 1998-2008 - June 2009COUNTRY AND REGIONAL BRIEFINGSUranium in Africa Nuclear Power in Argentina Nuclear Power in Armenia Australia's Uranium Nuclear Energy Prospects in Australia Nuclear Power in Belgium Nuclear Power in Brazil Nuclear Power in Bulgaria California's Electricity Nuclear Power in Canada Nuclear Power in Canada Appendix 1: Ontario Energy Policy Nuclear Power in Canada Appendix 2: Alberta Tar Sands Uranium in Canada Uranium in Canada Appendix 1: Brief History of Uranium Mining in Canada Uranium in Central Asia Nuclear Power in China Nuclear Power in China Appendix 1: Government Structure and Ownership China's Nuclear Fuel Cycle Nuclear Power in Czech Republic Nuclear Energy in Denmark Nuclear Power in Finland Nuclear Power in France Nuclear Power in Germany Nuclear Power in Hungary Nuclear Power in India Nuclear Energy in Iran Nuclear Power in Italy Nuclear Power in Japan Uranium and Nuclear Power in Kazakhstan Nuclear Power in Korea Nuclear Power in Lithuania Nuclear Power in Mexico Uranium in Namibia Nuclear Energy Prospects in New Zealand Nuclear Power in the Netherlands Uranium in Niger Nuclear Power in Pakistan Nuclear Power in Romania Nuclear Power in Russia Nuclear Power in Slovakia Nuclear Power in Slovenia Nuclear Power in South Africa Nuclear Power in Spain Nuclear Power in Sweden Nuclear Power in Sweden Appendix 1: Barsebäck Closure Nuclear Power in Switzerland Nuclear Power in Taiwan Nuclear Power in the United Kingdom Nuclear Power in Ukraine Nuclear Power in United Arab Emirates Nuclear Power in the USA Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 1: US Operating Nuclear Reactors Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 2 Power Plant Purchases: Nuclear Power in the USA Appendix 3: COL Applications US Nuclear Fuel Cycle US Nuclear Fuel Cycle Appendix 1: US Uranium Mining and Exploration US Nuclear Power Policy Emerging Nuclear Energy Countries


What are examples of nuclear power?

nuclear power


How are nuclear power plants?

by nuclear power ¬.¬


How does nuclear get its power?

Nuclear power is produced through two processes: Nuclear Fission and Nuclear Fusion.


Is nuclear power biology?

No. Nuclear power is not based on biology. It is based on nuclear physics.


What percentage of US power production is from nuclear power?

It is 28% nuclear power.


Does a CANDU produce nuclear or hydroelectric power?

nuclear power


What are the two nuclear power stations in Pakistan?

The Chashma Nuclear Power Complex and Karachi Nuclear Power Plant are in Pakistan.


What is nuclear power use for?

It is used for electricity in nuclear power plants == == Nuclear power is used to heat steam which then turns turbines, which generate electricity in nuclear power stations and also to provide propulsion and power on board nuclear submarines.


Is a nuclear power plant same as nuclear power station?

Yes, it generally is but a nuclear plant could refer to nuclear reactors which are basically the things that produce the power. So in essence, yes, a nuclear plant is the same thing as a nuclear power station