A rocket plane does not have to fight against air resistance if there is no air.
Whichever has the greater Mechanical Advantage.
yes, but not as efficient as other sources that polute more
Derelict
by water being placed into the bottle and then, when you launch your rocket, the rocket will spin (if it has at least 2 fins) and the water will spurt out and make the rocket go higher in the air. (Tip:the more it spins,the higher it will fly)
By making it more streamlined and aerodynamic
MULTISTAGE rocket ENGINES have MORE than A single STAGE and ARE more EFFICIENT in ACCELERATING the ROCKET................
its really both, it goes up like a rocket and comes down like a plane
It is cheaper and more efficient.
Whichever has the greater Mechanical Advantage.
It made it possible to fly greater distances with a rocket. Also it could be 2 different types of rocket like a more pushy one for blastoff, then a more compressed longer lasting cursing rocket. This was because it was more efficient that way.
Itβs makes a explosion
Rocket fuel contains oxygen, which is not found in space. A rocket in space could theoretically work in space if it were to carry its own oxygen, but other fuels such as hydrogen are more efficient.
It changes the flow of air over the ends of the wings making the plane more fuel efficient.
They are believed to be as the entire space plane is reusable instead of most of a rocket being discarded on every mission. However the space shuttle system was supposed to be more efficient than ordinary rockets because most of the vehicle was reusable, but it actually turned out less efficient for unmanned launches. One must be careful to consider all costs and tradeoffs and this is not easy for new not yet tried systems that might have unanticipated issues.
More efficient and most efficient are the comparative and superlative forms of "efficient".
A single stage rocket consists of only a single set of rocket engines and fuel containers. This assembly is used for the entire journey. A multistage rocket consists of several sets of engines and fuel containers that are used in succession. When the fuel of one stage is spent it detaches from the rocket to get rid of the weight and the next set of engines is ignited. Multistage rockets are far more efficient at getting things into space.
Depending on the purpous of the plane, the 787 is more efficient yes, but it can carry less passengers, and less cargo, then the 747.