Your question makes the assumption that "nukes" should be stopped. Nuclear weapons were developed to provide overwhelming military force. The case can and has been made that nuclear weapons are a necessity in preventing the use of force by other nations. While this is not a popular view among many people, the argument can be made that it is a realistic viewpoint.
"Nukes" is a colloquial term for nuclear weapons, which are explosive devices that derive their destructive power from nuclear reactions. These weapons can cause devastating damage and are considered weapons of mass destruction.
'Nukes' are Nuclear WeaponsA nuke is also called an atomic bombOr it is called a hydrogen bombSplitting a single atom in half creates a nuclear explosionNukes cause great damageThey could destroy huge cities
Nuclear missiles can travel intercontinental distances, with ranges varying based on the specific type and design of the missile. In terms of speed, nuclear missiles can travel at speeds of several kilometers per second, depending on the missile's propulsion system.
To reduce speed or stop, you should gently apply the brakes, decrease pressure on the accelerator, and come to a controlled stop. Additionally, use your turn signals to indicate to other drivers your intention to slow down or stop.
Modern nuclear weapons have advanced in technology and capabilities through developments such as increased accuracy, miniaturization, enhanced targeting systems, and improved yield-to-weight ratios. These advancements have made modern nukes more precise, powerful, and efficient in their destructive potential.
Yes but not easy. But the truth is if nukes are already in space there is no way that missiles can stop nukes.
No. Nukes are nuclear weapons but they suppose to use nukes to protect the earth not to destroy the earth. Eventually, nukes are not the best idea to use against other countries. We all know that nukes can win war but you should not use them.
Their minds and nukes. Should of just used Peaceful logic or nukes. To solve the problem.
That is a matter of opinion. I think no because we don't have proof of them making nukes, all we know is that they are enriching uranium.
There were no nukes in WWI.
Yes... in fact Russia has the most nukes.
No, because the Taliban wants Pakistans Nukes. Who knows what they will do with them? Jack Dombrowski, genius, said "We must not let the Taliban get Pakistans nukes"
Couldn't use nukes, couldn't invade N. VN, couldn't stop flow of Men/Material.
Nukes are called nuclear weapons.
No Nukes - film - was created in 1980-07.
Charles in Charge - 1984 No Nukes Is Good Nukes 4-1 was released on: USA: 31 December 1988
Family Ties - 1982 No Nukes Is Good Nukes 1-8 was released on: USA: 24 November 1982