It is a biomass becauseit is burned for energy.
Beacuse biomass is harder to find and coal burnes faster then Biomass.
Sunlight fed the plants that produced the material that became both coal & biomass fuels.
Biomass can be regrown quickly, making it a good alternative to coal.
The main advantage of biomass over coal is that it is "carbon neutral". This means that in order for the biomass to be created, it consumed carbon dioxide from the environment. Upon burning biomass, no additional carbon is added to our atmosphere. Coal, on the other hand, is taking carbon out of the earth and adding more to our atmosphere.
I am pretty sure that LESS electricity is generated with biomass, meaning that its use is not as common as coal.
No. Coal is fossil, wood is renewable, biomass.
Wood could be biomass if it is sustainably grown. Old growth forests are not biomass.
biomass is not cheap..biomass would cost almost twice as much on average as gas or coal-fired electricity.
Biomass is considered better than coal because it is renewable, meaning it can be replenished relatively quickly. Biomass also produces lower emissions of greenhouse gases when burned compared to coal, making it a cleaner source of energy. Additionally, biomass can be locally sourced, reducing transportation emissions and supporting local economies.
Biomass is considered better than coal because it is renewable and emits less carbon dioxide when burned. Biomass can also be sourced locally, reducing transportation emissions, and it can be a more sustainable option in terms of resource management.
Trees could be biomass if they are sustainably grown. Old growth forests are not biomass.Grass could be biomass.
One advantage of coal over biomass as a fuel is its higher energy density. Coal contains more energy per unit of weight or volume compared to biomass, making it more efficient for generating electricity or heat.