Pleading no contest, or nolo contendere, is a legal term used in court when a defendant neither admits nor disputes a criminal charge. By entering a no contest plea, the defendant essentially accepts the punishment without admitting guilt. This plea cannot be used against the defendant in a civil case based on the same set of facts.
Yes, pleading no contest is considered a conviction in legal proceedings.
no pleading no contest would your best bet
No contest.
no contest you throw yourself on the mercy of the judge
Not unless you can prove that you were legally poorly advised. You can't appeal a sentence just because you don't like it, there has to be some factual basis to your appeal.
Yes. Essentially a plea of "No Contest" is just a gentler sounding way of pleading "Guilty."
entreating = pleading with, begging
Pleading No Contest, nolo contendere in legal parlance, gets things over with. It also means the defendant is not admitting to being guilty. It avoids the cost and time associated with a trail. Typically the judge will be more lenient on the sentencing. It also cannot be used as ipso facto evidence in any civil trial that might arise from the incident.
A certificate is a document attached to a pleading certifying that the attorney properly served the pleading on the opposing party.
When asked how to you plead on the minor in possession charge, say no contest. The violation will be written on your record for up to three years. Afterward, you can get it expunged if no other violations accorded. Check with a lawyer before pleading anything in court.
Actually it has nothing to do with math. "pleading your fifth" means that you are pleading your fifth amendment which states that you cannot be forced to testify against yourself. So if you are pleading your fifth, you are actually using your fifth amendment right.
They are two entirely different pleas. NOT GUILTY is as, the name implies, you are pleading that you did not do it. If you plead NO CONTEST (Nolo Contendre), it means that you don't deny the charge made against you, and concede that the prosecution probably has enough evidence to convict you. No contest is just a "kinder and gentler" way of pleading Guilty.One advantage to pleading nolo, or "no contest," is that that the defendant is not required to allocute, or explain any details or circumstances of the alleged crime, and the pleading can't be used to establish negligence per se, malice, or guilt on your part if the charges lead to someone filing a civil suit against you. A guilty plea can be used as the basis for civil action from a victim seeking monetary or other damages, whereas a "no contest" plea cannot. This does not mean it provides absolute protection against civil liability, but it does confer some benefits.As to whether you should, decide for yourself - with the advice of a lawyer - if they do have enough to prosecute you or not. You are fully entitled to hear the charges against you. If you are sure they do not have enough for a conviction, then plead not guilty. If you think they could pull it off or that they will probably get you, then plead no contest.As mentioned above, it would be wise to consult an attorney before taking further action.