0
What else can I help you with?
Can the president refuse to enforce a court ruling?
No, the president cannot refuse to enforce a court ruling. The principle of checks and balances in the U.S. Constitution requires the executive branch to uphold and enforce the decisions made by the judicial branch.
What is political sovereignty?
Political sovereignty is the exclusive right to have control over an area, to operate the government, enact laws, and regulate activities and commerce. Commentary on the History of Sovereigns The establishment of monarchies and autocracies dates to the earliest civilizations and their tribal chiefs and councils. In medieval times, the king or church gave War Lords the "divine right" to their land. The monarch ruled over all things, persons, and properties in his. This was the beginning of Imperialism. Beginning with William The Conqueror, the monarch of England had life and death power over all things on the land, and some of this power was given to his followers to enforce the monarch's will upon the people, Signs of it still remain :All Swans on the Thames have a crown branded on their bill, indicating, they are the property of the monarch.All pheasants in England are by divine right, property of the Squire (villains) lord of the manor (villa). This act of monarchy, is what changed the word wick to what it is known today as "village".In the New World, Pope Alexander VI decreed the division of the Americas by Spain and Portugal, so that the wealth of gold, silver and jewels could be allocated. But these countries were soon overtaken by the French and English in North America. The founders of the USA incited the colonists to rebel against taxation by the British monarchy. The Revolutionary War established the United States as a democracy, with its own political sovereignty. The government was still essentially an autocracy until the industrial revolution brought about a new "ruling class" or oligarchy, that of business owners, directors, and bankers.
What model sees the state as representing the interests of a small but economically dominant class?
Marxist theory views the state as representing the interests of the capitalist class, who are economically dominant in society. According to this perspective, the state serves to protect and advance the interests of the ruling class, often at the expense of the working class.
Why did many revolutionary leaders shaping the government of the new nation begin to find the principle of democracy troubling?
Mainly because their conception of democracy was distinct from our own. They saw democracy in a Greek, classical sense, where the people had direct power and tyranny abounded (Ancient Athens). The leaders were conscientious of the issue of a majority potentially ruling unjustly and with an iron fist.
What characteristics of democracy distinguish it from other forms of government?
The characteristic feature of democracy is majority rule. The two most common principles are equality and freedom. A true democratic government has active citizen participation, favorable economy, widespread education, a strong civil society, and a social consensus.
What belief is the principle of popular sovereignty based upon?
The principle of popular sovereignty is based on the belief that the authority of a government is derived from the consent of the governed. It asserts that the people have the right to determine their own political and social structures through democratic processes, such as voting. This principle emphasizes that ultimate power resides with the populace rather than a ruling elite, thereby promoting individual rights and collective decision-making.
Why did popular sovereignty unconstitutional according to the dred Scott decision?
In the Dred Scott decision of 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that popular sovereignty—allowing territories to decide for themselves whether to permit slavery—was unconstitutional because it violated the Fifth Amendment. The Court argued that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, as doing so would deprive slaveholders of their property rights without due process. This ruling effectively nullified the principle of popular sovereignty and intensified the national debate over slavery.
How did the opinion in the dred Scott cases threaten the idea of popular sovereignty?
The Dred Scott decision undermined the idea of popular sovereignty by declaring that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, effectively invalidating the principle that the people of those territories could decide the issue for themselves. This ruling suggested that the rights of slaveholders were protected by the Constitution, negating the ability of local populations to determine their own laws regarding slavery. As a result, it intensified sectional tensions and highlighted the limitations of popular sovereignty in addressing the contentious issue of slavery in America.
In a democracy popular sovereignty is vested in?
In a democracy, popular sovereignty is vested in the people, meaning that the authority of the government is derived from the consent of the governed. Citizens have the right to participate in decision-making processes, typically through voting in elections. This principle ensures that the government reflects the will and interests of the populace, promoting accountability and representation. Ultimately, it emphasizes that power belongs to the people rather than a select few or a ruling elite.
Did The Constitution originally rejected the principle of popular sovereignty?
In a way; it was designed in such a way that majority rule would be circumvented by the electoral system (ie the senate and House of Representatives). The writers feared that the lesser-educated and more easily-swayed masses would be incapable of ruling themselves in the purest sense of the term.
How did the Marshall Court interpret the Constitution in it ruling?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the Marshal court interpret the Constitution in its ruling's?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the Marshall court interpret the constitution in its ruling's?
The principle of judicial review.
What is the definition of ruling?
adj. 1. Exercising control or authority: the ruling junta; ruling circles of the government. 2. Predominant: the ruling principle. n. 1. The act of governing or controlling. 2. An authoritative or official decision: a court ruling. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ruling
What is the explanation for the jurisdiction of the supreme court?
Supreme courts have full national jurisdiction, respecting the sovereignty of other nations in the process of ruling.
The constitution declares that the sovereignty lies with the people explain?
The declaration that sovereignty lies with the people means that ultimate authority and power rest with the citizens of a nation, rather than a monarch or ruling elite. This principle is foundational to democratic governance, where the government's legitimacy derives from the consent of the governed. It emphasizes individual rights and participation in the political process, ensuring that citizens have a voice in decision-making. Thus, the government's role is to serve and represent the will of the people.
What is England popular for?
ruling most of the world in the 1800s
