answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, studying politics through the lens of everyday life allows us to understand how political systems impact individuals and communities on a day-to-day basis. Observing how people interact with politics in their daily routines provides insight into power dynamics, social issues, and policy outcomes.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Political Science

Is politics best defined as the art of government agree or disagree?

Disagree. Politics encompasses more than just the art of government. It involves the process of making decisions that apply to members of a group, including how power and resources are distributed. Politics also involves the interactions among individuals and groups in society.


What is the clear average in politics?

The clear average in politics refers to the general consensus or common understanding among people about a particular political issue or topic. It represents the middle ground or prevailing viewpoint that most individuals tend to agree upon.


What assumptions about international politics are shared by Liberals and Realist?

Both Liberals and Realists commonly assume that states are the primary actors in international politics and that the international system is anarchic. They also agree that states seek to preserve their own security and pursue their national interests. Additionally, both perspectives acknowledge the importance of power and the impact of power disparities in shaping international relations.


Why do people agree to a social contract?

People agree to a social contract to establish organized society. By agreeing to abide by certain rules and norms, individuals can benefit from the protection of their rights and the enforcement of laws. In return, they accept limitations on their behavior to maintain order and security for the greater good.


What is the role of propaganda in international politics?

propaganda serves to subtly turn the people of a nation against the nation they are fighting against by means of dehumanizing and demonizing the enemy. This garners support for the war and makes it easier for people at home to understand why they are fighting a war they may not understand, and easier to justify sending their family members off to fight.

Related Questions

Do you agree that micro targeting signals the dehumanization of politics?

yes i agree


Politics is more than what politicians do?

Yes,I do agree on the statement because politics is all about the way of developing the country which the politicians do not do.


Is there a book which can help learn politics or handle politics in the workplace?

Government in America. This book is great for helping people understand the politics of America. I do not agree with all of it's views, but it does tell you how to get informed.


Do you agree that political microtargeting signals the dehumanization of politics?

That is a tough question. Since you are asking what I think, I'd have to go with "yes." But politics is politics. It is very hard to make politics the sport of gentlemen. It is what it is.I think your question should be: "Is politics dehumanizing." And the answer to that question is "Yes, it is."


Is Glenn Beck good or bad?

The question is not "do we agree with his politics". As a person, he is a very good man.


What do elections of 2004 and 2008 show about Americans during the period?

they did not agree on war economics


What are the two statements that agree with Mexican politics?

It is considered a parliamentary government with a one-party system.


Why were consuls important in ancient Rome?

The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.The consuls' agreement in the ancient Roman government made for smoother running of the government. However, politics being politics, if the consuls did not agree, one could override the other and if that didn't work, one consul in cahoots with a tribune could get his way.


Which would the trandscendentalists most likely agree with?

Transcendentalists believe that religion and politics essentially corrupted the individual, it was a movement created in response to intellectualism. There are many that would still agree with transendentalism.


How do you use the word diverge in a sentence?

We agree on so many things until it comes to politics, there our opinions really diverge.


Who goes to the White House?

Presidents and normal people not involving politics. And they go there because it is also a hotel. I kind of don't agree on that answer


Why does people hate Romney?

For some reason, some people hate other people just because they don't agree with them. Most people who hate Mitt Romney don't agree with his policies, politics, or religion.