Rostow's Development Model categorizes countries into five stages of economic growth: traditional society, preconditions for take-off, take-off, drive to maturity, and age of high mass consumption. For example, countries in Africa and parts of Asia are generally in the traditional society and preconditions for take-off stages, while countries in North America, Western Europe, and parts of Asia are in the age of high mass consumption stage.
Countries that are considered to be in preconditions for take-off, according to the Rostow's stages of economic growth model, are typically in the early stages of industrialization and experiencing rapid economic development. For example, some countries in this stage may include Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Ethiopia, where there is a growing manufacturing sector and increasing urbanization. These countries are characterized by investments in infrastructure, education, and technology to support their economic growth.
In every country around the world, there are different political views that take over the country. Even though one country may view politics a certain way, a neighboring country may have different political views.
Representative democracy as known today originated in ancient Greece, particularly in Athens. The concept was further developed during the Enlightenment period in Europe, with key contributions by philosophers such as John Locke and Montesquieu. The modern form of representative democracy began to take shape with the establishment of constitutional governments in countries like England and the United States.
Sports bring countries together, even though it is comPetitive. Take the olympics for example. The whole world is together in following these events. Although we root for our respective countries, we gain admiration, appreciation, and respect for foreign people.
In many countries that take refugees, they have schemes where groups are brought to parts of the country and given the help they need to settle in their new country.
16997
First, we should contrast which countries have taken a larger number of refugees from those who have not. Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Arab states have argued that they cannot take refugees because of the possible terrorism implications and because they feel that giving up money to pay for their survival is duty enough. This, of course, is ridiculous. Arabs should take care of their own.However, Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey have each taken 1.4 million, 1.9. million, and 2.3 million refugees. All three have basically argued that they are strained and overtaxed by the refugees that they have taken in and cannot afford to take in anymore, resulting in them closing the borders or, in Turkey's case, turning a blind eye towards Europe-bound migration. However, they took them in up to that point because the governments of those countries were sympathetic to plight of their neighbors and wished to protect them in their moment of desperation.
we took over 900 refugees
204
During World War 2 the Vatican took in many refugees and hid them from the Nazis. Recently (2015) they took in a few refugee families from Syria.
Many tried to leave, but immigration was very strictly controlled by other countries. The U.S. was very reluctant to admit many refugees. Moreover, Germany did not allow refugees to take money out of the country, and other countries were not at all keen to admit people who were likely to become a public burden. In general, it was much easier for young, single people with good qualifications to leave than for people with family responsibilities.
Possibly because no country would take the refugees.
Jewish refugees and many survivors of the Holocaust sought their own homeland and returned to Palestine. They formed the country of Israel in 1948 and have fought opposition from the Arab countries ever since.
I have not got the answer yet.
It's not how many computers it takes to store google it's how many servers in a data centre does it take an I think google has around 450 servers each in different countries
There are many different countries that have an efficient train service. The United States, Great Britain and France all have extensive and efficient train services to take people all over their countries.