"democratic socialism" isn't a political science concept - that is, there is not a specific governmental type (or subtype) of that name. Note that "socialism" (with a small "s") refers to an economic model, not a political model, with "Socialism" referring to a complete political/economic system. Thus, "democratic socialism" actually describes a form of economic model, not a political/economic model, which is what I assume the question is looking for.
If what you are looking for is a Democracy which follows socialism as an economic model, well, then, you're pretty much out of luck; there are generally but a very, very few countries which use socialism (as defined by political scientists and economists) as their economic model, and none of these countries could be called a Democracy.
Instead, what I suspect you are looking for is the following:
This kind of country is what United States mass media (and political discussions) generally label a "Socialist" country, despite this being a horrible misuse of the word (and meaning) of Socialist.
Frankly, by the distorted US meaning of Socialist, the vast majority of 1st World countries follow "Democratic Socialism", including virtually all of Europe (save perhaps the U.K.), Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and even places like Brazil. Not to be snide, but saying "democratic socialism" during a US political debate is basically inferring that some country is almost a Communist country - that is, it's used as a slur rather than something which has a distinct meaning.
Objectively speaking, if you are looking for a democracy which has implemented a large section of the socialist-style societal goals, then the Scandinavian countries (Norway, Sweden, and Finland) are good examples, as would Spain, France, and possibly Portugal.
Two countries that operate under a form of democratic socialism are Sweden and Denmark. They have mixed economies that combine elements of capitalism with a strong welfare state, including universal healthcare, free education, and social safety nets. Both countries prioritize social equality and high standards of living for all citizens.
Syria is officially a republic with a mixed legal system of civil and Islamic law. It is governed by the Ba'ath Party, which is a socialist political party, although the country does not operate under a communist system. The government has been criticized for limited democratic practices and human rights violations.
Some countries that have historically or currently operate as single-party states include China, North Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba. These countries are characterized by only allowing one political party to hold power, with dissenting parties or voices heavily restricted or suppressed.
One of the biggest factors keeping many African countries from having healthy economics is a lack of infrastructure, including poor transportation systems, inadequate electricity, and limited access to clean water. This hinders economic growth by making it difficult for businesses to operate efficiently and for goods and services to be delivered effectively. Additionally, political instability, corruption, and conflict have also played significant roles in hampering economic development in many African countries.
Political parties play a crucial role in modern democracies by representing diverse interests and values, facilitating the formation of government, and holding leaders accountable. They provide structure and organization to the political process, mobilize voters, and offer a platform for citizens to participate in political decision-making. Without political parties, it would be difficult to sustain the functioning and stability of democratic systems.
false
They have no such obligation.
When citizens have the power to decide how a country should operate it is known as a democracy.
It is difficult to answer this question because many countries that claim to be Socialist or have a Socialist or Communist Party in power do not enact Socialist ideological policies. Therefore, there are three very different answers. Note: These lists are not exhaustive. 1) Countries which openly identify as Socialist or Communist, but do NOT implement Socialist policies: People's Republic of China Mongolia Laos Vietnam 2) Countries which do NOT openly identify as Socialist or Communist, but do implement Socialist policies: Bolivia Brazil Chile Ecuador Finland Spain Sweden Venezuela 3) Countries which openly identify as Socialist or Communist, and implement Socialist policies: Cuba North Korea
socialism
In how many countries does google operate?
market socialism is a term used to denote two different economic system based in socialism which operate according tomarket priniciples.
Socialism and Communism are the same: a classless stateless society. It will have to operate at a global level, with no countries or borders, because production everywhere is so intertwined. So there can be no such thing as a Socialist or Communist country.
in which 2 countries do the basque separatists operate?
"Classical socialism" usually refers to the conception of socialism that emerged in the late-19th century as an economic system that operated according to different economic laws than those that operate in capitalism. These included the idea of economic planning in place of markets for capital goods, measuring value in physical quantities instead of using money, and public ownership of resources in place of private ownership, along with worker's democratic management in the economy. "Classical socialism" differed from later developments in the 20th century, especially neoclassical socialism, which included a role for money and prices in a socialist system, and the Soviet-type economic system (sometimes called "actually-existing socialism"), which was meant to be a transitional economy in-between capitalism and pure socialism.
Democratic Socialism is a term used by socialists, usually to distinguish themselves from the authoritarian Marxist-Leninist/Stalinist governments that existed during the 20th century. It advocates a democratic political system alongside a socialist economy. The term itself is not contradictory, and neither are democracy and socialism. Of course un-democratic 'socialist' regimes have existed, examples referred to usually being the Soviet Union or Cuba, but this does not mean that democracy and socialism are mutually exclusive. For a proper socialist society to operate, democracy is key, as the means of production are owned by the workers and not by a small group of capitalists (like a board of directors, CEO, or even a government). When society is run for the common good of the people, and not the personal gain of a select few, democracy and co-operation is necessary for this society to function. While this may be more of an individual opinion than verifiable fact, I would make the conjecture that most socialists today would be 'democratic socialists', but don't use the term as many of the Marxist-Leninist/Stalinist movements have become the minority since the dissolution of the Soviet Union and loss of interest in the ideology. The real divide with socialists today is between revolutionary and reformist ideologies, but most of them would subscribe to a democratic form of socialism.
No countries.
Sony is an electronics company that operates in many different countries. For example, they operate in Japan, which is where the company is based.