It depends on one's viewpoint.
If one views government as existing solely to prevent man's baser instincts from allowing us to slaughter eachother, one could say that the tyranny of government is a necessary evil, preventing the tyranny of individualism from destroying mankind.
On the other hand, if one views government as a means of cooperative collaboration, and something which allows us all to live together peacefully and (hopefully) harmoniously while taming our baser human instinct, then we should consider government as a good thing.
In either case, politics is the means by which governments operate. It is impossible to separate politics from government - even in a absolute Dictatorship system, politics are still a fundamental portion of how government works. The word "politics" itself denotes a competition of ideas about governance; how those ideas compete (and how they "win" or impact the populace) depend on the government form.
Thus, politics is a neutral term, it cannot be inherently "good" or "bad".
International politics refer to two or more nations getting along together, like such, the United Nations is a form of International Politics. Domestic politics are politics based in only one country, such as President, Vice President, Prime Minister, and so on.
Critical thinking is not inherently bad for politics. In fact, critical thinking can help individuals analyze political issues, evaluate arguments, and make informed decisions. However, the way critical thinking is used in politics can vary, and individuals may have different perspectives and biases that influence their critical thinking process.
Addressing issues of greed and bad politics is essential in tackling hunger problems. By promoting fair distribution of resources and ensuring effective governance, we can work towards a more equitable food system that prioritizes the well-being of all individuals. Additionally, supporting sustainable agriculture practices can help improve yields and increase food security for vulnerable populations.
tin politics the letters APL stand for Australian Pupils Politics.
It is hard to Justify the nature of politics as scientific because politics is a social aspect. The nature of politics can be defined by Geoffrey Roberts as: "A nation or a society characterized by a political culture, into which its children are inducted, and by learning which they participate and preserve values and institution's" Thus the scientific nature of politics are defined by society.
Nope
Bad.
bad politics, corruption, unemployment, low salaries...
The politics. And the high suicide rates.
He is essentially good but was made to do evil by Hera.
Corn, wheat, and bad politics
it was really bad
Politics in 1987 was when Ronald Reagan was President. The economy was nasty because the Stock Market crashed in the Fall of that year. Everybody lost everything, and a lot of families were essentially left in the poor house. It left a divide of politics and lingering hate filled emotions of its citizens.
1. Politics 2.economy 3.customs
This question implies that politics is a negative thing. Politics is the function of governance, how policy is determined with a state. It is a process, it is not inherently good or bad. That said, there is a negative connotation with the term politics, as, for an American audience, it reminds us of the sense of partisan political deadlock that seemingly prevents us from adequately addressing our problems. If we assume that we are in a state of partisan deadlock, and we take it that this is a bad thing, it could be viewed that this is not actually politics, but the prevention of politics, as it prevents policy makers from doing their actual jobs.
An allowance for bad debt is essentially a reduction in a bank's accounts receivable. The allowance for bad debt equals the amount of the banks loans that it does not expect to collect.
ya its good