0
What else can I help you with?
When building an outline how should a writer categorize each piece of evidenceAsk us anything?
When building an outline, a writer should categorize each piece of evidence based on its relevance to the main points or arguments. Each piece of evidence should support a specific point or idea in the outline, helping to reinforce the writer's thesis or central argument. It's important to organize evidence cohesively within the outline to ensure a logical flow and effective support for the writer's main ideas.
Why is Obama considered the Most Corrupt President In US History?
The only people who say this are some of the president's Republican political opponents, and they say it to make him look bad, so they can defeat him. There have been many corrupt administrations in American history-- Warren G. Harding and Richard Nixon come to mind. But whether you like President Obama or not, it is completely false to say he is "the most corrupt president in history," since the facts do not support such an assertion.
How should historians determine which argument is superior if two arguments about an historical event contradict each other?
Historians should assess the evidence supporting each argument, consider the credibility of the sources, and evaluate the context in which the arguments were made. They may also look for consensus among other historians or seek additional evidence to support one argument over the other. Ultimately, the argument that is best supported by a preponderance of evidence and critical analysis is considered superior.
Which evidence would support an argument that voter turnout is at historically low levels?
A decrease in voter registration rates, a decline in the number of individuals participating in elections over successive cycles, and a noticeable drop in voter turnout compared to previous years or decades would all be evidence supporting an argument that voter turnout is at historically low levels.
How do historians build and support their historical arguments?
Historians build and support their historical arguments by conducting extensive research, analyzing primary sources, and engaging with existing historiography. They use evidence to construct a coherent narrative and draw interpretations based on their findings. Additionally, historians explore multiple perspectives and possible explanations to provide a well-rounded argument.
What does the allegations are not sustained mean?
If it is in a court order, it means that the court did not find that there was sufficient evidence presented to support the allegations, and they are therefore not found to be fact. If it is in a different context, please rephrase and reask.
How does Evidence Response Team ERT support criminal investigations?
Evidence Collection
Why the role of evidence is critical in a criminal case?
Evidence is crucial in a criminal case because it provides proof to support or refute allegations. It helps establish the facts of a case, allows for a fair trial where the truth can be determined, and influences the jury or judge in making a decision on guilt or innocence. Insufficient or unreliable evidence can result in wrongful convictions or acquittals.
What is the truth behind the Harris Chicago scam allegations?
The truth behind the Harris Chicago scam allegations is that they are unsubstantiated and have not been proven. The allegations suggest that Harris Chicago engaged in fraudulent activities, but there is no concrete evidence to support these claims. It is important to wait for a thorough investigation to determine the validity of the allegations before making any conclusions.
What evidence do you need to submit to the court as a defense against false allegations.?
Pleadings like the complaint and the answer are not evidence. The standard practice is to conduct what is called discovery. You can ask written questions about the facts to support the allegations of the complaint, demand documents and take the depositions of the witnesses. The plaintiff is not necessarily obligated to proceed at trial with all of the claims, but you can have the witnesses and documentary evidence available at trial to disprove the claims.
What evidence do you need to submit to the court as a defense against false allegations?
Pleadings like the complaint and the answer are not evidence. The standard practice is to conduct what is called discovery. You can ask written questions about the facts to support the allegations of the complaint, demand documents and take the depositions of the witnesses. The plaintiff is not necessarily obligated to proceed at trial with all of the claims, but you can have the witnesses and documentary evidence available at trial to disprove the claims.
Can cps get a court order against you even if they have no evidence to support allegations?
For any agency to gain a court order would require for the agency to prove to a court that the order was justified by the facts But, it does depend on the allegations. The court may decide to rule on the side of caution. This frequently happened to fathers accused of sex abuse where no clear evidence can be established.
Was Bill Clinton a pardoned federal felon?
check out the investigation done by Snopes.com... http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/felon.asp
What are the goal of criminal investigation?
The goal of criminal investigation is to gather evidence to determine if a crime has been committed and to identify and apprehend suspects. Investigators aim to gather enough evidence to support a prosecution in court and ultimately achieve justice for victims and ensure public safety.
Can you put corroborating in a sentence?
Corroborating just means giving support to, or confirming. Her corroborating evidence helped the police find the real criminal.
Is it true that some people believe PokerStars is rigged?
Yes, some people believe that PokerStars is rigged, but there is no concrete evidence to support this claim. The company has denied any allegations of rigging and states that their games are fair and random.
Why is it useful for a criminal lawyer to have a basic understanding of the principles of forensic pathology?
Knowing how the evidence works means you can then use it to support or fight the accusations made.
