Policies in one polity which use coercion to make other polities do what they want.
Expansive population policies refer to government strategies aimed at increasing population growth within a country. These policies may include incentives for having more children, increased support for families, and initiatives to promote higher fertility rates.
Antinatalist countries, such as China and India, have policies in place to limit population growth. These policies include restrictions on family size, incentives for sterilization, and education programs promoting smaller families.
The establishment, which includes government officials, political parties, and influential individuals, plays a significant role in shaping political decisions and policies. They often have the power and resources to influence decision-making processes, lobby for certain policies, and set the agenda for political discussions. Their influence can impact the direction of policies and decisions made by elected officials.
Anti-natalist countries, such as China and India, have policies in place to discourage population growth. These policies include restrictions on family size, financial penalties for having more children, and incentives for sterilization or contraception.
Policy context refers to the background, conditions, or factors that shape the development, implementation, and impact of policies. It includes the political, social, economic, and cultural environment in which policies are created and applied. Understanding the policy context is essential for designing effective policies that address specific issues or problems.
The most imperialistic state in the world is Great Britain (they have colonies in XXI century). So Russia is imperialistic not more than USA =)
is being part of the imperialistic approach beneficial to your country?
no
"Imperialistic" can be a subjective evaluation and opinion, but it can safely be said that under the present administration in power, definitely not.
Yes, both Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson's policies toward Latin America can be described as imperialistic. Roosevelt's "Big Stick" diplomacy emphasized military intervention and the assertion of U.S. influence, exemplified by the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which justified intervention in the region. Wilson, while advocating for moral diplomacy, still intervened in several Latin American countries to protect U.S. interests and promote democratic governance, ultimately reflecting an imperialistic approach. Both presidents aimed to expand U.S. influence and control in Latin America, often at the expense of local sovereignty.
They were imperialistic.
idk what acts your talking about, but before WW2 the US was beginning to have more imperialistic policies. These can be seen in the US interactions with Latin America and Asia.
France
Old kingdom
All answer are correct
Yes, there are parallels between democratic yet imperialistic Athens and the current United States. Both societies exhibit a commitment to democratic ideals while simultaneously engaging in expansionist policies that extend their influence globally. Athens, through its empire, exercised power over other city-states, often justifying its actions as promoting democracy and stability. Similarly, the U.S. has been involved in international interventions and military actions, often framed as promoting democracy and human rights, despite criticisms of imperialistic tendencies.
1887,