Advantages of the comparative approach in political science include the ability to identify patterns and trends across different political systems, facilitating a deeper understanding of political phenomena. It also allows for the testing of hypotheses and theories in a broader context.
Demerits of the comparative approach include the challenge of ensuring comparability across different cases, potential biases in selecting cases for comparison, and the complexity of controlling for confounding variables in diverse political settings. Additionally, there can be limitations in generalizing findings from comparative studies to a larger population.
One demerit of using a philosophical approach in the study of political science is that it can lead to abstract and theoretical discussions that may not always have clear real-world applications or relevance. Additionally, philosophical perspectives may differ widely, leading to debates that are often subjective and open to interpretation. Lastly, focusing too much on philosophy may neglect empirical data and practical analysis, which are critical in understanding the complexities of political systems and behaviors.
Merits of democracy include promoting citizen participation, protecting individual rights, and fostering political stability. However, some demerits include potential for populism, slow decision-making processes, and susceptibility to corruption.
Merits of modernization include improved technology, infrastructure, and living standards. It can boost economic growth and productivity. Demerits may include cultural erosion, environmental degradation, and social inequalities resulting from uneven development.
Merits of a coalition government include representation of diverse interests, fostering cooperation among political parties, and promoting decision-making through consensus. However, demerits can include instability due to differing ideologies, difficulties in implementing policies, and potential for gridlock or slow decision-making.
Advantages of DemocracyDemocracy can provide for changes in government without violence. In a democracy, power can be transferred from one party to another by means of elections. The jurisdiction of the citizens of a nation determines its ruling authority.Moreover, any government is bound by an election term after which it has to compete against other parties to regain authority. This system prevents monopoly of the ruling authority. The ruling party has to make sure it works for its people for it cannot remain being the authority after completing its term unless re-elected by the people.This brings in a feeling of obligation towards the citizens. The ruling authorities owe their success in the elections to the citizens of the nation. This results in a feeling of gratefulness towards the people. It can serve as their motivation to work for the people for it is the common masses that have complete power over choosing their government.Another important advantage of democracy is that the people gain a sense of participation in the process of choosing their government. They get the opportunity to voice their opinions by means of electoral votes. This gives rise to a feeling of belongingness in the minds of the people towards their society.Disadvantages of DemocracyIn a democratic nation, it is the citizens who hold the right to elect their representatives and their governing authorities. According to a common observation, not all the citizens are fully aware of the political scenario in their country. The common masses may not be aware of the political issues in society. This may result in people making the wrong choices during election.As the government is subject to change after every election term, the authorities may work with a short-term focus. As they have to face an election after the completion of each term, they may lose focus on working for the people and rather focus on winning elections.Another disadvantage of democracy is that mobs can influence people. Citizens may vote in favor of a party under the influence of the majority. Compelled or influenced by the philosophies of those around, a person may not voice his/her true opinion.Every form of government is bound to have some shortfalls. Different people have different views about the various political systems. The advantages and disadvantages of any political system have to be weighed carefully in order to arrive at any conclusion.
advantages and disadvantages of plastics
what are the merits and demerits of srilankan labour laws
shell sort merits and demerits
blekko merits and demerits
What are the merits of financial statements presentation?
what are demerits of civil sciety organization
Write a merits and demerits of using function in program
i think u r from IIBMS yes
1. advantages and disadvantages of RTL family?2. merits and demerits of DTL family ?
One demerit of using a philosophical approach in the study of political science is that it can lead to abstract and theoretical discussions that may not always have clear real-world applications or relevance. Additionally, philosophical perspectives may differ widely, leading to debates that are often subjective and open to interpretation. Lastly, focusing too much on philosophy may neglect empirical data and practical analysis, which are critical in understanding the complexities of political systems and behaviors.
Advantages: it is an alternative source of electricity and heat; it is at the base of fission bombs.Disadvantages: radioactive wastes are produced.
ayurveda has many advantages and it has many disadvantages to... slowresult,restrictions on diet,coastly