Democracy is a Greek word which means: Mob rule. Mob mentality is hardly the sort of opinion anyone should want to use as council. There is no greater kangaroo court than the court of public opinion. Logic and reason give way to common sense and common sense gives way to common sentiments and common sentiments give way to mistrust and fear. Why is public opinion held in such regard? I'm not exactly sure what Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan are up to as I try to avoid this type of news but it's clear just by listening to public opinion that they are surely up to something and the public is fascinated by it. In the United States the word democracy is bandied about as some sort of buzz word for honored freedom. Yet in the United States the Constitution provides for a republican form of democracy with clear restraints placed upon a democracy. Those restraints exist because the framers didn't trust public opinion any more than I do today. Public opinion is not to be trusted exactly because people like to ask questions like what factors determine the formulation of public opinion in a democracy. What factors? How about Propaganda? Psychological fear, the promise of plunder, protection from our common enemies no matter how real, these are factors that determine public opinion anywhere. Follow the masses if you so chose, you are free to do so. That is, of course, unless the masses have gained a true democracy and the majority has decided that you are not free to do so after all.
Public opinion is important in democracy because it reflects the will of the people, who elect their representatives to make decisions on their behalf. It serves as a mechanism of accountability for policymakers and helps ensure that government actions align with the interests and values of the public. Public opinion also plays a crucial role in shaping public policies and influencing the functioning of democratic institutions.
The political approach to policy development involves considering the influence of political factors, such as power dynamics, interest groups, and public opinion, on the formulation and implementation of policies. It emphasizes the role of government officials, lawmakers, and political institutions in shaping policy decisions to reflect ideological beliefs, party agendas, and electoral considerations. This approach highlights the need to navigate competing interests and negotiate compromises to enact policies that are politically feasible and sustainable.
A caucus or a convention to choose whom a party will support during an election does not necessarily create a situation closer to a direct democracy. What it does do is cap the level at which democracy occurs. For example, John is a Republican. He wants Ben to become president. John votes in the caucus for Ben, but Ben does not win. Instead, Paul wins and becomes the Republican presidential candidate. At this point in time, John's opinion is thrown out the window. He is left with 3 choices : vote with his party, vote Democrat, or vote for some third party guy (notice how none of these are his original opinion?) So, no, a caucus or convention is not closer to a direct democracy. Hope this helps ^_^
External factors influencing foreign policy in Zimbabwe include international alliances, global economic conditions, and regional stability. Internally, factors such as domestic politics, public opinion, and economic challenges can also impact foreign policy decisions.
Demographic factors help shape political opinion through a process known as political socialization, where individuals adopt political beliefs and values based on their background. Factors like race, ethnicity, and region can influence how individuals view issues and candidates due to differing experiences and perspectives within these groups. These demographic characteristics can also affect political behavior and voting patterns.
To determine all the factors.
Free public opinion is the soul of Democracy, since they are inside of the ethical and moral values.
That is entirely a matter of opinion.
Factors that characterize the nature of public opinion are mass media,opinion leaders,environmental factors, and other complex factors.
Officially the USA is a Democracy, but my opinion is that it is essentially owned by the powerful.
for my opinion the climate,the slope, the amount of rain and humus,and last the length of evolving clock .
for my opinion the climate,the slope, the amount of rain and humus,and last the length of evolving clock .
plato smells really bad and is old and Socrates was the man so he obviously was right..
for my own opinion she was contribute in our country is a democracy and freedom to us......
That is a question of opinion so there is no right or wrong answer. :)
Where people decide their leader for whatever organization based on the opinion of the vast majority of people. A complete contrast to democracy in North America.
a democracy is a form of Government ruled by the opinion of the people and a monarch is one person ruling every one (like a King).