A type of Democracy in which the citizens delegate authority to elected representatives.
One alternative is "indirect democracy," where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
freedom of choice
it is also said as a republic
there is no other way of saying democracy
Degates
In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, while in a direct democracy, citizens participate directly in decision-making processes, such as through voting on laws and policies themselves. Representative democracies often have a system of elected officials who represent the people's interests, compared to direct democracies where citizens have a more immediate role in governance.
people who disagree with the government can generally run for office themselves.
In a monarchy, citizens have limited participation as the ruler holds most of the power. In a direct democracy, citizens have the most active participation by directly making decisions on laws and policies. In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, giving them indirect participation in the governance process.
Farmers, countryfolk, or rural dwellers.
People may risk their lives for democracy because they believe in the principles of freedom, equality, and participation in decision-making processes. They may see democracy as a way to ensure their rights are protected, hold leaders accountable, and have a say in governing their own lives and communities. Additionally, some individuals are willing to sacrifice for democracy because they see it as a means to create a more just and inclusive society for future generations.
In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, while in a direct democracy, citizens participate directly in decision-making processes, such as through voting on laws and policies themselves. Representative democracies often have a system of elected officials who represent the people's interests, compared to direct democracies where citizens have a more immediate role in governance.
the united states is a representative democracy
In a Represenitave Democracy, there is almost no absolute unity between poilical parties, thus there will always be arguing, which can get in the way of what really matters.
The adult male citizens voted. They voted in fortnightly assemblies. In today's representative democracies, citizens elect representatives to a parliament, and hope that their representative will vote the way they wish.
Ancient Rome created a system of government that can be called a republic. This concept was lost to the world until on the beginning of the US republic of 1789. The Roman republic was based on a written set of laws. The most basic way to explain their republic is to say that Rome had two houses of power. One was the body of two consuls elected annually by the citizens of Rome. The Senate was comprised of the aristocracy and appointed by magistrates.Rome also had a judicial system.
In a direct democracy, every single member of the group has an equal say in every single decision. This is not workable on a day to day basis for large groups. In a representative democracy, people elect representatives, who vote on the issues.Representative democracy is the basis of constitutional democracy. Representatives are chosen by the people to act in their best interest, not necessarily to vote the way the people want them to in every circumstance. Direct democracy is very difficult to maintain when a population becomes too large.Some societies operate with a combination of both types of democracy. For example, in some countries, such as France, Switzerland and the Republic of Ireland, some issues, for example, changes to the constitution, can be decided by a popular vote on that specific issue. In some of the small Swiss cantons (states) such as Glarus, all citizens are entitled to attend an annual meeting which votes retrospectively on the laws passed during the preceding year by their representatives. and also credit to the person who last posted this
Egypt is currently in transition from being an Illiberal Democracy governed by a Military Junta to a Representative Democracy. Stay tuned to the current elections to see which way the country goes.
democracy
you've got is another way to say you have.
no, democracy would be more inclusive and representative under a socialist system More to the point, democracy is a political theory/system, while capitalism is an economic system/theory. They are not directly connected in any way to each other.
In a direct (or radical)l democracy the citizens met in regular assembly, considering and deciding on all matters of government. A Council implements these decisions. This is far more democratic than today's indirect (representative) democracy where elected representatives form a parliament and vote how they or their party want, not necessarily the way their electors want. The US has a representative democracy - that is the citizens elect representatives to Congress who are supposed to represent their views.
There are many ways to participate in one's government. The most common way is to vote in all elections, expressing your views by doing so. Another way is to work on a candidates campaign for election or reelection. Also, a person can run for public office. This can be at the local, state or federal level.