answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Whether absolutism or democracy is more effective depends on a specification of what is 'effective', the ability to measure (and strictly compare) that specification, and the implementation of that model on these types of governments. Unfortunately, in political theory, these questions are widely disagreed on, since the purpose, origin, and use of politics is a constant topic of debate, and one's take on these vital issues heavily guides their idea of effectiveness. For example, a Libertarian would likely represent effectiveness as negative freedom and, in this case, believe democracy is superior to absolutism. Conversely, a divine theorist may suppose that authority is delegated to an absolute authority by some objective right, and so absolutism is more effective (or morally justified) than democracy.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

3d ago

Effectiveness depends on the context and goals of the governing system. Absolutism can lead to quick decision-making and implementation, but may lack accountability and citizen participation. Democracy allows for broader representation and checks and balances, but can be slower in decision-making. Ultimately, the most effective system depends on the specific needs and values of a society.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is more effective absolutism or democracy?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Political Science

What is tutelary democracy?

Tutelary democracy refers to a form of democracy where an external entity, often a military or governing elite, intervenes in the political process to ensure stability or safeguard specific interests. It can involve limiting participation and decision-making power of the citizenry, leading to a more restricted form of democracy.


What is the opposite of absolutism?

Relative location.


Is pure or direct democracy more effective to govern a country like the united state?

Pure democracy involves direct participation of all citizens in decision-making, which can be slow and inefficient in a large country like the United States. Representative democracy, where citizens elect officials to make decisions on their behalf, is more practical due to the country's size and complexity. This system allows for expertise, efficiency, and greater representation of diverse viewpoints.


Is it possible to govern a democracy without political parties?

It is possible to govern a democracy without political parties; however, political parties often play a key role in organizing political activity and providing structure to the democratic process. Without political parties, decision-making and representation may become more decentralized and potentially less effective.


What is the main way a representative democracy differs from a direct democracy?

In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, while in a direct democracy, citizens participate directly in decision-making processes, such as through voting on laws and policies themselves. Representative democracies often have a system of elected officials who represent the people's interests, compared to direct democracies where citizens have a more immediate role in governance.

Related questions

What form of government was most effective democracy or absolutism for the 17th and 18th centuries?

Considering that there were no democracies for the entire 17th century and all but the last two decades of the 18th century, but there were absolutist states during those periods, absolutism wins by default.


What is an antonym for the word absolutism?

Relativism Democracy Liberalism Libertarianism Anarchism


What is the Name of the king of Pakistan?

There is no king in Pakistan. Pakistan is a country of democracy, not absolutism nor dictatorship.


Which of the foundations of democracy is considered the key to an effective democracy?

The necessity of comprimise


How did absolutism differ between Western and Eastern Europe?

In western Europe absolutism was enforced as opposed to Eastern Europe where there was some form of absolutism but not to a full extent it was leaning more towards serfdom.


what situation is called when all citizens had the right to attend assembly to meet in open discussion and cast votes in ancient athens1. direct democracy2. totalitarianism3. parliamentary democracy 4. absolutism?

Direct Democracy


What foundation of democracy is considered key to an effective democracy?

Individual freedom is the foundation of democracy and is considered the key to an effective democracy. Individual freedom is the belief in the primary importance of the individual and in the virtues of self-reliance and personal independence.


How is the ideas of the enlightenment connected to the idea democracy?

it's though that "democracy" is the most effective form of government. they think it's the best, and that countries that have a democratic government are more advanced than those who don't. this is why they are connected


What monarch embodies enlightened absolutism more than any other?

Frederick the Great


What is the monarchical rule by enlightenment principles?

Enlightened Absolutism


What is the difference between liberalism and absolutism?

Liberalism focuses on the idea of freedom and equality to benefit all people. Absolutism concentrates all power and privilege into the hands of just a few or, more commonly, just the monarch.


What is tutelary democracy?

Tutelary democracy refers to a form of democracy where an external entity, often a military or governing elite, intervenes in the political process to ensure stability or safeguard specific interests. It can involve limiting participation and decision-making power of the citizenry, leading to a more restricted form of democracy.