there would be utter choas! Not quite, at least neither the anarchists nor the libertarians would think so. Libertarians would see it as ultimate freedom and give them the power to do what they want with their corporations and businesses, and anarchist would see it as a way to start anew without any authoritarian structures of any sort to ruin their socialistic ideals.
Without laws or government, society would likely descend into chaos as there would be no framework for maintaining order, resolving disputes, or protecting individual rights. It would be challenging to ensure safety, enforce agreements, and promote justice without any governing authority in place.
A government in which people elect delegates to make laws is a Representative Government.
The executive branch is responsible for carrying out laws in a parliamentary democracy. This branch is led by the prime minister, who is typically the head of government and oversees the administration of laws and government policies.
A limited government can only pass laws that are specifically permitted by the constitution. This ensures that the government does not overstep its boundaries and remains accountable to the constitution and the citizens.
Without government, there would be no formal structure to enforce laws, provide public services, or regulate society. This could lead to chaos, lack of coordination, and difficulty in resolving disputes or achieving common goals. An absence of government could also result in lack of protection for individual rights and greater potential for oppression or exploitation.
Yes, states can make laws that regulate and govern local governments within their jurisdiction. These laws often specify the powers, responsibilities, and structure of local government bodies such as cities, counties, and school districts. States may also delegate certain powers to local governments, subject to state oversight and control.
what is a real life example of limited government
Life in America would be very chaotic if the government could not make people obey the laws. Since people would not obey people of authority, they would do whatever they wanted and there would be no order anywhere.
Laws of government A+
Montesquieu believed that all things were made up of rules or laws that never changed. He set out to study these laws scientifically with the hope that knowledge of the laws of government would reduce the problems of society and improve human life.
If there was no government then there would be no laws and policies, no peace and harmony. That's why we need government.
The legal government of a country makes the laws of that country. In the United States, it would be Congress.
The government have to make laws that are equal.
Living in a country with no laws would be called Anarchy. Anarchy occurs when the system of government has broken and there are no more laws or the laws aren't being enforced. Usually living in Anarchy would be an awful situation for you because someone might come along and shoot you in the head or steal your handbag because there are no laws against it. One advantage would be that if you want something, you can just steal it from the shops, the shopkeeper might bash you up though. A disadvantage would be that you have more risk of being killed or losing precious things. it is definitely better to live in socialism or in democracy!
That would be the executive branch of the United States government. It is their job to execute the laws passed by the legislative branch.
That would be whatever Laws the Haitian Government enacts.
To live in a state of nature would be absolute chaos and hell. There are no rules, no laws, no government. Although it could be beneficial to have no corrupt government or dictators, one will eventually form.
the Government makes the laws for us