A manager refuses to hire a worker who is in favor of unions
A secondary source may be considered unreliable if it is based on incomplete or biased information, lacks credibility or expertise, or has not been properly fact-checked or verified. It is essential to critically evaluate the source's authoritativeness and accuracy before using it for academic or research purposes.
Not really. It is very rarely okay to be. The case where it would probably be fine to be dishonest is in the case of defending someone or your country. For example if you were a soldier who has been captured, you would be dishonest with your captors to defend your homeland. But other than that, not really.
Benefit of the Bargain is a type of consequential damages in contract law, aiming to compensate the non-breaching party for the loss of the full value or benefit that would have been received had the contract been performed as agreed. This type of damages seeks to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been fulfilled.
It depends really, Ancient Political Science? Or modern? I'll do them both! For Ancient I would say Plato, not only did he develop ideologies but he also studied social Politics such as voting behaviour. While modern is a bit more harder, as we're influenced by many things such as the political spectrum. Overall I would say Edmund Burke.
Yes, Singapore is considered a democracy, but it is often described as a "flawed democracy" due to restrictions on freedom of speech and limitations on political opposition. The country has regular elections, but the ruling party has been in power for decades.
A Noble, a cleric or a peasant.
A Carpenter
A Carpenter
The promise of better jobs in the united states would have been considered a pull factor.
No. That would be appropriate in many situations when one person has been extremely close and helpful to the testator in life. The power of attorney is extinguished upon the death of the principal.No. That would be appropriate in many situations when one person has been extremely close and helpful to the testator in life. The power of attorney is extinguished upon the death of the principal.No. That would be appropriate in many situations when one person has been extremely close and helpful to the testator in life. The power of attorney is extinguished upon the death of the principal.No. That would be appropriate in many situations when one person has been extremely close and helpful to the testator in life. The power of attorney is extinguished upon the death of the principal.
It is for a dead person, or a "coroners case" in legal terms. For policing a person is not considered to be dead unless they have been decapitated, or have rigor mortis or have begun decomposing so a body found in any of these situations would be a 10-55.
"Would have been" is used to talk about hypothetical situations or events that did not happen in the past. It is used to describe unrealized possibilities or regrets about the past. It is not used to refer to events in the future.
These situations must have been preceded by warning signs.
No.
Pull factor
Farmer Apex 😜
Farmer Apex 😜