pluralists
People may risk their lives for democracy because they believe in the principles of freedom, equality, and participation in decision-making processes. They may see democracy as a way to ensure their rights are protected, hold leaders accountable, and have a say in governing their own lives and communities. Additionally, some individuals are willing to sacrifice for democracy because they see it as a means to create a more just and inclusive society for future generations.
Whether absolutism or democracy is more effective depends on a specification of what is 'effective', the ability to measure (and strictly compare) that specification, and the implementation of that model on these types of governments. Unfortunately, in political theory, these questions are widely disagreed on, since the purpose, origin, and use of politics is a constant topic of debate, and one's take on these vital issues heavily guides their idea of effectiveness. For example, a Libertarian would likely represent effectiveness as negative freedom and, in this case, believe democracy is superior to absolutism. Conversely, a divine theorist may suppose that authority is delegated to an absolute authority by some objective right, and so absolutism is more effective (or morally justified) than democracy.
Because a Democracy is the best form of government hands down. In a Democracy, people have freedom, people can speak freely, people have rights. Unlike in other countries where they have to believe what everybody else believes and they can only have one child and everything.
In a democracy, the will of the majority cannot be used to deprive minority groups of their fundamental rights and freedoms. This principle is often safeguarded by constitutions and legal protections to prevent discrimination and ensure equal treatment for all individuals within society.
South Carolina supported the Virginia Plan, which proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population size. This plan favored larger states like South Carolina, as it would give them more influence in the national government compared to the New Jersey Plan, which called for equal representation for all states.
Anthony does not believe that she lives in a true democracy. She argues that the democratic ideals of equality and representation are not fulfilled, particularly for women and marginalized groups. Her advocacy for women's rights and suffrage highlights her belief that a genuine democracy should include the voices and rights of all citizens. Therefore, she views the current system as flawed and in need of significant reform.
The radical Republicans did believe that Catholicism was a threat to the democracy of the US because of the anti-democracy teachings then.
A democracy.
yes, in fact the only lasting democracy was based of many things Christians believe, this democracy was America (not as we know it but the way it was 200 years ago)
The Democracy
yes
he didnt
Fascism
Democracy, I think
they believe these are representation of a one true god
The direct democracy gave power to the people so the people supported it.
I do believe it was the Articles of Confederation