answersLogoWhite

0

George Washington did not warn against the geography-based power base of any political parties, because there simply were no political parties in his day. The new United States was (as the name implies) a confederacy of geografically defined areas, so it would not even have been logical for him to be against a geography-based political system.

Today, the influence on geography on parties' power even gets bigger. Over the last years, the Republicans (mostly, whenever they got a majority in the Federal or State Congress) have sought to perpetuate their hold on States and Districts by a process called Gerrymandering. This is a process in which the geographical boundaries of voting districts are redrawn in such a way as to assure a majority of Republican voters. In a more distant past, Gerrymandering was practised by both parties, but now by all accounts it is the Republicans who are doing it nationwide today.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Political Science

Which leader was against the formation of political parties?

George Washington spoke out against them in his farewell address.


Political parties unite or divide a country?

It's more of a personal opinion stated from whether you believe in states' rights or federal government. However, more conclusions lead to the division of a country such as the Civil War with the Bleeding Sumner incident, where one political party member (Republican Sumner) verbally attacked a Southern Democrat (Brooks) and Brooks beat Sumner cripple with a cane. This doesn't sound like a united country to me. They were meant to unite Americans, but in uniting, we have divided; now the majority of the population is concerned about what their party believes, not what is right or just. Personally, I'm not a fan, and I believe we should have listened to Washington's Farewell Address when he warned America to stay away from political parties.


Who was responsible for advising president washington on foreign affairs?

In his farewell address, President Washington warned against "foreign entanglements," by which he was referring to alliances with European powers that might draw the US into a European war. Many people took this to be advice against all international activity.


What is the relationship of politics to other disciplines?

This question provides the opportunity to speak about politics to its relationship to political science. Often times the two terms are treated as the same thing, however, they are not. Politics involves, as one example, of the art involved to pass a controversial bill in the US Congress, when there seems that the chances are slim to do so. Politics also involves with an individual or political party take a stand on a particular public issue and running for elective office on that position in policy. And, running for public office and the election chances of a candidate is based on public opinion polls. Recently US President Obama warned Russian Federation President Putin not to invade the Crimea. Obama was making a political statement. Now, in comparison to the information stated above, political science, is a social study that involves political philosophy and how it may affect the political policies of a nation. Political Science also makes much of the study of a nation's government and how it functions. With that in mind, to say that an editorial in a newspaper endorsing a political candidate based on what the individual believes should be done to reduce the national debt, touches on, but does not encompass political science. Political science also involves the study of political systems of the past and the history of a certain type of government, the ancient Roman republic, as one example. This is not an area of politics, but rather an area of political history. And the philosophy behind the ancient Roman republic.


Who warned of the dangers of the military-industrial complex?

Major General Smedley Butler - Author of the book "War is a Racket" "WAR is a racket. It always has been. A few profit and the many pay. But there is a way to stop it. You can't end it by disarmament conferences. You can't eliminate it by peace parleys at Geneva. Well-meaning but impractical groups can't wipe it out by resolutions. It can be smashed effectively only by taking the profit out of war." -- Major General Smedley Butler, USMC - 1935 General Dwight David Eisenhower In his Farewell Address to the Nation on January 17, 1961, President Eisenhower said, "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."*** Comments that do not answer the question were moved to the discussion area. General Butler and President Eisenhower warned us about the military-industrial complex, but it wasn't the root of the economic crisis of 2008. The root of the economic crisis of 2008 was an unregulated market in complex derivative securities.

Related Questions

Washington warned that political parties would do what?

He warned that political parties would become more important than the common good of the country. If you think about the political parties today it seems he can be right about that.


What did George Washington's say about political party?

He warned about the dangers of parties.


What political party read into the Constitution?

In 1789 there were no political parties. In fact Washington warned about the formation of parties and how they would put their interests before the common good of the people. Looks like he was right.


Is it true that George Washington favored the system of political parties?

Actually George Washington was extremely against the use of the political system. Washington himself didn't involve himself in a political party and in his farewell address, he warned against the political party system and stressed that the United States should stay neutral in order to survive.


What leader warned Americans that political parties may have harmful effects?

George Washington was strongly against America dividing into two different political parties. In his farewell address, he wanted the people of his nation to be united, and he felt that political parties would turn his nation against each other. He also warned against foreign entanglements.


What 3 things did Washington warn about in his farewell address?

President Washington advised that the US stay neutral (no fighting/wars),stay away from fighting in political parties, and stay out of debt. He warned about political parties and debt


What did Washington warn the US against in his farewell address?

Washington warned against all political factions (political parties).


What were the two dangers Washington warned Americans against?

He warned them of the dangers of political parties/because it would divide the country/people had different ideas so they made political parties He also warned them not to make foreign alliances and we followed that for a while but then we stopped


What document warned Americans against political parties and foreign entanglements and regional differences?

Washington's Farewell Address (1796)


Is the political parties mentioned in the us constitution in most of the articles?

No. Political parties are not even mentioned in the Constitution. In fact, the first President, George Washington, warned against factions and parties as being injurious to the nation.


Did George Washington favor any political party?

He did not favor any political party. In fact, he warned against political parties in his farewell address, saying that they could lead to intense factionalization that could divide the country.


What is the name of the potical parties that emerged in 1797?

None were in the 1790's. They had two different ideas on government, but the parties hadn't formed. Washington warned against the formation of political parties.