The early Christians understood that money could corrupt bible principles for some. To allow favors or money to establish people in positions of authority does not enhance spirituality but degrade it. We see this too many times today where money can influence judicial proceedings or influence political systems so to allow money to compromise our basic moral standards is or should be rejected by true Christians.
There have always been individuals in the Church who have been corrupt as every single individual who ever lived, saving Our Blessed Lord, and His Mother, have been sinners. The Church, however, is the Body of Christ, and Our Blessed Lord promised the Holy Spirit to guide Her until the end of the world. The Catholic Church is incapable of being corrupt, although individuals within her, including Popes, may be. To say that the Church was corrupt is to say that Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, was corrupt, which is nonsense. The vast majority of corrupt individuals during the Renaissance was neither more nor less than at any other time in history, it has just gotten a lot more press because heretics used corrupt individuals as an excuse to leave the Church and start their own religions. The Catholic Church, however, was never corrupt, and could never be.
I do not have personal opinions or preferences.
If there was one thing that made the Catholic Church corrupt to its core, for centuries to come, it was the creation of the document known as the Donation of Constantine. The Donation of Constantine was an eighth-century forgery purporting to be from Emperor Constantine in the fourth century, bestowing huge ecclesiastical and political authority upon Pope Sylvester and his successors. Pope Stephen II took his document to Pepin, king of the Franks, in 755, asking for help so that lands then held by the Lombards be "restored" to St. Peter himself, because four centuries earlier Constantine had granted them to Sylvester. In the grand scheme of things, this reflects on Stephen and his forger, probably a papal official called Christophorous, not on the Church as a whole, and there is no suggestion that subsequent popes actually knew the Donation to be a forgery.The Donation of Constantine changed the papacy, making it a prize to be fought over or bought, and therefore changed the Church itself. The Papal States won by Stephen and subsequently consolidated and expanded, helped make the pope the richest man in Europe. During long periods of the Middle Ages, simony, murder and corruption became common currency at the highest levels of the Catholic Church. Popes who bought their way into office did not stop with living in incredible luxury, but openly kept concubines or mistresses, and provided for the 'nephews' who resulted from these unions, often promoting them to the positions of bishop or cardinal while still in their teens.
The Pledge of Allegiance is recited as a national tradition or practice in the United States of America.
The old testament in the Holy Bible gives the death penalty to sex offenders so if part of the Catholic church didn't even call the police and and have such corruption ended, then they were not following the Bible. It was death penalty through the legal system, never vigilante. Another perspective : This is a tricky question to answer - on the one hand it could be corrupt leaders outside the church or it can be leaders inside the church. In cases involving the leaders of the church, there is a tendency to cover up the matter - in effect do nothing. In cases of leaders outside the church, the church will assist with advice and in in bad cases even possible protests and sermons against such leaders / corruption.
Simony is the ecclesiastical crime of paying for holy offices or positions in the hierarchy of a church
simony
Simony is the act of buying or selling spiritual gifts, services, or positions within the church. It is considered a corrupt practice that undermines the integrity of religious institutions.
The practice of buying and selling ecclesiastical offices or positions is known as simony. The term is derived from "Simon Magnus," a magician mentioned in the book of Acts (8:9-24) who tried to buy from Jesus' disciples the ability to confer the Holy Spirit through the laying on of hands. Simony took place in both the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church. It was one of the major issues at stake in the Investiture Controversy.
Simony is named after Simon Magus who, in the Acts of the Apostles 8:9-24 offered two disciples of Jesus, Peter and John, payment in exchange for their empowering him to impart the power of the Holy Spirit to anyone on whom he would place his hands. Simony was widespread in the Catholic Church in the 9th and 10th centuries. Also the Church of England struggled with the practice after its separation from Rome. It is not apparent if one person encouraged simony in the early church
simony
It is the act of Simony.
Simony
1. using the practice of laying investiture 2. bishops selling positions in the church-a practice called simony 3. many village priests married and had families
Simony is a sin in the Catholic Church, however, I do not believe that the Civil government views it as a crime.
A:No. Simony is a form of ecclesiastic corruption, involving the sale of Church privileges. Martin Luther fought against simony.
Many village priests married and had families.Such marriages were against Church rulings. Bishops sold postions in the Church a practice called simony. Using the practice of lay investiture kings appointed church bishops.Church reformers believed the Church alone should appoint bishops