the power of absolute monarchs is unlimited
theee
wit swag
Because their power was absolute. They could over-rule Parliament and the church.
England was an absolute monarchy until the end of the English Civil War. The English Civil War lasted from 1641-1651.
A king possesses the powers that his subjects give him (or maybe tolerate in him). Most extant kings are "Constitutional Monarchs" which means that an elected government passes laws which the monarch then signs. Generally this type of monarch does not have the veto power that is possessed by an American president. He is the head of state, but this is a purely symbolic thing.
It limited the monarch's powers, saying that the king is not above the law, that the king is subject to the law.
Enlightenment ideas challenged the absolute authority of monarchs by promoting the concepts of individual rights, reason, and the social contract. Monarchs faced pressure to adopt more limited forms of government, adhere to constitutional principles, and grant greater rights to their subjects. Some monarchs, like Frederick II of Prussia and Catherine the Great of Russia, embraced certain Enlightenment ideas while seeking to maintain their power.
An absolute monarchÃ?s power is only limited by the size of the land they are governing. Unless a monarch rules over the entire planet, their power is still not truly absolute.
Enlightenment thinkers reduced the power of European monarchs by promoting ideas of individual rights, separation of powers, and limited government. They challenged the divine right of kings and advocated for constitutional monarchies or republics based on the rule of law. These ideals influenced the development of political systems that placed constraints on the absolute authority of monarchs.
Magna Carta
Theoretically speaking, absolute power. Practically speaking, their power was limited to varying extents by the aristocracy/religion or another traditional authority.