A king possesses the powers that his subjects give him (or maybe tolerate in him).
Most extant kings are "Constitutional Monarchs" which means that an elected government passes laws which the monarch then signs. Generally this type of monarch does not have the veto power that is possessed by an American president. He is the head of state, but this is a purely symbolic thing.
Because they only have to answer to themselves when it comes to their actions. There is no check and balance system. Left unchecked or unchallenged will result in absolute dictatorship.
In France, the political structure of absolute monarchs was known as "absolutism." This system concentrated power in the hands of the king, who ruled without significant checks from other institutions, such as the nobility or the church. The monarch was seen as the embodiment of the state, exercising control over all aspects of governance, law, and society, often justified by the doctrine of the divine right of kings. Notable absolute monarchs include Louis XIV, who famously declared, "L'état, c'est moi" ("I am the state").
Several conditions in Europe facilitated the establishment of absolute power among rulers, including the decline of feudalism, which weakened the influence of nobility and decentralized power structures. The rise of centralized bureaucracies allowed monarchs to exert greater control over their realms. Additionally, the challenges posed by religious conflicts and wars fostered a need for strong leadership to maintain stability and order. Finally, the support of emerging middle classes and the growth of trade provided monarchs with the financial resources necessary to consolidate their power.
Absolute Power in all sector of life was key. This power allowed French monarchs to portray themselves as practically gods. Louis XIV was called the "Sun King" because of his immense power. The Kings of France held absolute authority, but they did not govern alone. The task of running a nation was too much for one man. As a result, French monarchs would often appoint ministers to advise him and take care of the details that the King did not have time or interest for. These men were nobles and members of old, rich French families that were looked upon favorably by the crown. Ministers for War, Finances, and Trade were common. French monarchs also had the absolute power to tax. Unlike in England, where the right to tax was restricted by an elected parliament, French monarchs could tax as they wished. However, this did not always work out well because the burdens of taxation fell mostly on the poor working class. Clergy and the aristocracy were exempt from most taxes. Additionally, French kings always spent more than they were bringing in from taxes, so an immense national debt resulted, and would eventually come to head with civil unrest during the 1780's
Absolute Power grossed $50,068,310 in the domestic market.
the power of absolute monarchs is unlimited
theee
wit swag
Because their power was absolute. They could over-rule Parliament and the church.
England was an absolute monarchy until the end of the English Civil War. The English Civil War lasted from 1641-1651.
Actually, quite the opposite. Absolute monarchs exercise supreme power; similar to a despot, or dictator; and are bound by no laws of a constitution, or parliament.
a) it was opposed to the absolute power of monarchs, and the Emperor of Austria was an absolute monarch. b) The Emperor of Austria was Marie-Antoinette's brother
Absolute monarchs were not needed. It simply happened. When Charles I became an absolute monarch, he lost his head. When James II of England became an absolute monarch, he escaped England with his life. No one was willing to fight on his behalf. Kings simply try to gain more power for themselves just as presidents do.
money (taxes) which buys power (army)
Where did the Monarchs get there Power
Where did the Monarchs get there Power
Absolute monarchs' centralized power led to social and economic disparities, which angered the lower classes. The Enlightenment promoted ideas of individual rights, liberty, and equality, inspiring people to challenge the authority of absolute monarchs. These factors contributed to revolutions as people sought to overthrow oppressive regimes and establish more inclusive and democratic governments.