Because they only have to answer to themselves when it comes to their actions. There is no check and balance system. Left unchecked or unchallenged will result in absolute Dictatorship.
I believe you mean Monarchies. Monarchs are Royalty which rule over sovereign nations. Anarchy is a total lack of government and control systems, it is natural selection and survival of the fittest.
Define justified. Would he be punished if put in front of a Supreme Court? Did his victims get what they deserve in an equal fashion? It depends on your perspective and whether you approve of lynchings or believe nobody is above the law.
The justification of killing often depends on context, moral frameworks, and individual beliefs. In cases such as self-defense, war, or protecting others from imminent harm, some argue that killing can be justified. However, ethical perspectives vary widely, and many believe that taking a life is inherently wrong regardless of circumstances. Ultimately, the question remains deeply complex and subjective, reflecting diverse philosophical, cultural, and legal viewpoints.
To be accepted as a Hindu, one has to absolutely believe in Vedas to understand the nature of unknown (Self, Absolute, Brahman). Only vedas and nothing else can be used to understand the nature of unknown.That is one has to reason only within the framework provided by the Vedas. If a conclusion you draw is not compatible with what the vedas imply or mean then you have to believe that your line of reasoning is wrong. So, in short Vedas have to be accepted as the final authority as a means of knowledge to understand the Absolute. The thing to understand clearly here is that for Hindus the domain of vedas is strictly Metaphysics. For things that are perceptible no need to use vedas because now one can understand the nature of things by observation and inference. So, legally, constituitionally and socially for one to be accepted as a Hindu, one should believe in the authority of Vedas as a means of knowledge to understand the Absolute. Caste, creed, sect, birth are not a hinderence.
Senator Works believes war is justified when it is necessary to protect national security, uphold justice, and defend against aggression. He emphasizes the importance of diplomatic efforts, advocating for war only as a last resort after all other avenues have been exhausted. Additionally, he argues that military action is warranted when it aligns with the principles of democracy and human rights. Ultimately, he sees war as a grave responsibility that should be approached with careful consideration and moral integrity.
because during that time period it was widely aknowledged that they were chosen by God to rule, due to this they percieved themselves to far superior to everyone else, subsequently the were able to condone what they did.
Monarchy believed that they were given the throne by God and they stood between man and God.
To make the citizens believe in the power and strength of their rulers and gods.
they were called absolute rulers because people believe that they have absolute powers granted by god so the people need to follow the rulers. The rulers also have divine-rights and they were responsible to no one but god.
Not everyone will agree. If you believe Bonifacio's actions were tresonous, yes his execution was justified. If you believe his actions were not treasonous, then his execution was not justified.
The monarchs of Europe believed that they were divinely chosen.
No -- and no one should believe in such obscure ideas of absolute authority.
I believe you mean Monarchies. Monarchs are Royalty which rule over sovereign nations. Anarchy is a total lack of government and control systems, it is natural selection and survival of the fittest.
yes they were family any1 knows that
he doesnt
Murder can be justified in cases such as the preservation of human life or in the case of self defence. This is very controversial as many people believe that how can some one judge what is justified to what is not.
AnswerAbsolute monarchs are people who forcefully take power by either gaining their power from the army or having a powerful family that had many followers. I believe that absolute monarchs are dumb for even trying to forcefully take power from the people while also knowing that they were going to sometime fall. Also knowing that if they finally fall, that means DEATH!!!!!!